"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

You've got it backwards. Any chance that if Bush had NOT invaded
Iraq, he would have more friends, or at least more people who would
patiently wait for him to vanish from public life? Or, do you think a
person's deeds are not connected with his reputation?
I thought it was the intent rather than the action that determines the
effectiveness of a person or a project?
That makes no sense. If a project fails, but you gave it your best
effort, then your intent was wrong?
The intent of Johnson's great society was wrong, it failed.

Your conclusion: 100% of the time, when a project fails, the intent was
wrong.

Got it. Just wanted to make sure I understood you correctly.


Bush *needed* a war, for personal reasons. Cheney needed it for his own
reasons. It had nothing at all to do with the good of this country.
What personal reasons?

Nothing you're educated enough to understand.

Why can't you them Doug and we will see if I can read them at least.


Your president once said he spent a couple of hours per day playing video
games. He also stated that he doesn't read much. That may be appropriate for
some grown men, but not for a president. I am 100% sure that his world view
is based on his pastimes, as well as a religion which promotes the concept
of a savior.