LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.paddle
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 108
Default Rogue River Question Answered

krueger wrote:
Bill,

Not really sure.

The big difference between the two is length, width and amount of
tumblehome. Don't really remember how wide the Caption was, but 6 inches
narrower maybe????? It also had a tendency to dive into waves whereas the
Dimension climbed, but think they had same amount of rocker. We would do
the same run/level with both boats, the Dimension dry, Caption wet, and I
don't think it was "us". Anyone else have any thoughts?

We always thought of the Dimension as a "big water work horse", the Caption
a "hot-rod" play boat.
We got the first Dimension in '91, now working on #2. The Caption we bought
in '96 and sold '04 and had not been used for several years.


Carol

"Bill Tuthill" wrote in message ...
krueger wrote:


Why do you think the Caption tandem is so unstable when full of water?
Both Dimension and Caption canoes are made by Dagger: you'd think they'd
know how to prevent that behavior.

On a lower Tuolumne trip last fall (below La Grange dam) we had one spot
where two canoes tipped over. In my IK, I helped with rescue, and was
flabbergasted how easy it was to push fully-waterlogged canoes to shore.
So I'm not surprised they handle well in that state, especially if they
aren't really full due to float bags (the canoes on the lower Tuolumne
had no float bags).



Performance vs. stability is always a tradeoff.

Typically, they don't handle at all well when swamped. Are you, Bill,
referring to a whitewater boat, fully bagged, floating upside down?
THOSE are easy to push around because they weigh less than 100# unless
they have a lot of gear lashed in. But right-side-up and full of water
(at 8#/gal.) a canoe may be carrying 400# more than its original load
(you and yer partner), and ~700# is an absolute bear to move and
maneuver.


PS, I bought the Pentax Optio W10 before I left on my recent 3-week
Rocky Mountain boating trip. Shot nearly 700 pictures; haven't
downloaded them for full-screen viewing yet. I'm not very excited
about the slow reaction-time and dimness of the monitor, nor the lag
between click and pic (which caused most of my close-up action shots to
catch the subject halfway out of frame).


-Richard, His Kanubic Travesty
--

================================================== ====================
Richard Hopley Winston-Salem, NC, USA
rhopley[at]earthlink[dot]net
Nothing really matters except Boats, Sex, and Rock'n'Roll
rhopley[at]wfubmc[dot]edu
OK, OK; computer programming for scientific research also matters
================================================== ====================

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"A Dam Good Time" - Trip Report, Ottawa River Keenan & Julie General 7 September 8th 05 12:25 AM
Ohio River Way's Paddlefest 2005 Garrison Hilliard General 5 June 3rd 05 05:37 PM
Rogue River Trip Gearboat needed mid June Jim Ham General 0 May 20th 05 05:11 AM
The Problem with River Grading Systems riverman General 14 January 25th 05 10:09 PM
River Kayak Question.... Barry Touring 11 October 7th 04 04:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017