"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right?

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html

They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they
interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered
your stance on something when you've been given proof that your
previous mindset was wrong?

So let's talk about Schnapps and Whiskey...

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right?

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html
They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they
interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered
your stance on something when you've been given proof that your
previous mindset was wrong?

So let's talk about Schnapps and Whiskey...

ROTFLMAO!

NOYB wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right?

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html

They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they
interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered
your stance on something when you've been given proof that your
previous mindset was wrong?

So let's talk about Schnapps and Whiskey...

That's been proven by me. Don't remember? Laughing gas getting to your
brain? Did you figure out exactly what length of time "almost
instantaneous" is? How long IS it?