"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:42:02 -0400, Bert Robbins
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right?

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html

They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they
interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered
your stance on something when you've been given proof that your
previous mindset was wrong?


Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a
mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit.

Bert, why don't you post where in the NAS's report they have revised
any data from 400 years to 2000 years.

Obviously, all of the mind changing, twisted logic, and
(dis)information is coming from your "breitbart" source.

Since you are relying on them for the "facts," why don't you explain
the accuracy of their article:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/0....07o4imol.html
which was posted the same day as the NSA report?

They really seem to be challenged by the facts as much as Santorum
was. You guys just don't value fact checking prior to disclosure very
much do you?

Last night's news reported comments FROM THE PENTAGON which said the mustard
gas was virtually useless at the time of our arrival, and dated back as far
as the Iran-Iraq war. They added that these were not the types of weapons
they considered to be a priority. Some must think the Pentagon is now a
hotbed of left-wing thinking.