Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gosh, wouldn't it be refreshing to have them say, for a change, "We don't know"? They don't know. I don't know. But I do know they don't know the temperatures of a few hundred years ago - and certainly not a few thousand. I gotta think this whole warming nonsense is nothing more than a tool for those that wish our technology would just plain stop. Pure politics. I am old enough to remember when the same folks were spouting off about "global cooling". Go ahead - say "I don't know". Yeah, right. Dale |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"FishWisher" wrote in message
oups.com... But I do know they don't know the temperatures of a few hundred years ago - and certainly not a few thousand. How do you KNOW that? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But I do know they don't
know the temperatures of a few hundred years ago - and certainly not a few thousand. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: How do you KNOW that? It must be true, he heard it on right-wing hate-talk radio. All this environmentalist crap is from the limp-wristed libby-rulls who want the gov'mint to take away your SUV... it's the first step towards taking away your guns... next they'll outlaw NASCAR and chewin' tobacco... DSK |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() FishWisher wrote: Gosh, wouldn't it be refreshing to have them say, for a change, "We don't know"? They don't know. I don't know. But I do know they don't know the temperatures of a few hundred years ago - and certainly not a few thousand. I gotta think this whole warming nonsense is nothing more than a tool for those that wish our technology would just plain stop. Pure politics. I am old enough to remember when the same folks were spouting off about "global cooling". Go ahead - say "I don't know". Yeah, right. Dale Dale, Like you, I remember back in the 70's or 80's all the "experts" were talking about global cooling, all the news reports about the coming ice age, it was everywhere. And then the weather started getting warmer, and they stopped talking about the next ice age, and started talking about global warming. Didn't they blame it on the same gasses? I remember when they tried to blame it on Freon getting up there and destroying the ozone layer. One little problem, Freon's heavier than air, it stays down here with us, not up in the ozone layer, they stopped talking about it. I guess the "experts" changed their minds about global cooling. Anyone want to guess what they'll come up with 10 or 20 years from now when it starts to cool off again? Unfortunately, the young people of today never heard these reports, they were too young, or weren't born yet. So they beleave what their told and taught. And the news people are just looking for a story, they don't really care if it's true or not, their just telling you what the experts said, that's their out. Anyone that knows anything about statistics can tell you a one degree change in a short period of time (400 years out of the life of this planet is less than a blink of an eye, over thousands of years, you may have something) is insignificant. But hey, it keeps all the "experts" off unemployment. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Capt John wrote: FishWisher wrote: Gosh, wouldn't it be refreshing to have them say, for a change, "We don't know"? They don't know. I don't know. But I do know they don't know the temperatures of a few hundred years ago - and certainly not a few thousand. I gotta think this whole warming nonsense is nothing more than a tool for those that wish our technology would just plain stop. Pure politics. I am old enough to remember when the same folks were spouting off about "global cooling". Go ahead - say "I don't know". Yeah, right. Dale Dale, Like you, I remember back in the 70's or 80's all the "experts" were talking about global cooling, all the news reports about the coming ice age, it was everywhere. And then the weather started getting warmer, and they stopped talking about the next ice age, and started talking about global warming. Didn't they blame it on the same gasses? I remember when they tried to blame it on Freon getting up there and destroying the ozone layer. One little problem, Freon's heavier than air, it stays down here with us, not up in the ozone layer, they stopped talking about it. Not true! even though is heavier than air, it will mix and by current, get into the stratosphere easily, when in it's gasseous state: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/env99/env256.htm |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. Childish and petty name calling certainly does nothing for your credibility. Grow up. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. I see that you are incapable of debating the issue. Just like Rush and Sean, when you can't bring real and honest data to the table, start childish name calling. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What Happend 400 Years Ago? | General | |||
Deregulated VHF, Ten Years After | General | |||
Olive wants to go to the Caribbean ! | Cruising | |||
CO2 'highest for 650,000 years' | General | |||
Who Am I | General |