What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:54:05 GMT, Don White wrote:

JimH wrote:


The wind blew, the crap flew, and in walked Herring, covered in denial.
You've been facilitating right-wing trash like Bert for years, Herring,
and each time you get nailed for it, you offer up the same old lame
excuse.



As Don asked earlier, I wonder when his Sheriff term expires?



This is a real problem for John.
If he wants the Office of Sheriff, he not only has to be fair to all
posters, he has to bend over backwards to give that impression.
At this point there are too many posters he continues to scrap with on a
regular basis. It's almost impossible for him not to show favoritism.
He probably should resign his self appointed office until he can conquer
his own demons.

Don, you make a much better impression when your posts are *immediately*
following Harry's.
--
John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John posts yet another personal attack.

Giddyup!

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Bryan wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right?

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html
They do have it right, Bert. Give the most logical explanation that
best fits the available evidence. When new evidence arises, adjust the
explanation to fit the evidence. Is there something wrong with this
objective approach to understanding our world?
Science is nothing more than observation and consensus. You observe
something and then you look for consensus of your observation by your
"peers." This consensus can be biased by political and economic
considerations.

Does the phrase "it is accepted in the scientific community" cause you
to sit up and say what do you mean "accepted?" It does with me because
it means that it is not all objective.

Newton needed no consensus, nor did Einstein.
Newton made an observation and then he had to gain consensus from his
fellow scientists to accept his observation.



And, if one scientist happens to be correct, but nobody else understands,
then he's wrong? Is that what you think?

That is what is called accepted science. And, that is how the system
works. It isn't right but it is pervasive in the scientific community.

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:21:56 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

Every time I make a post you, Don or Doug Kanter as respond. It
appears that the three of you need to get lives.

We consider it a public service......
somewhat like vermin control.
Well, you need to go back to school because you haven't been able to
exterminate me.

I said *control*, not extermination.
What do you think I am...the US military?
No, you are the Canadian government arresting a group of boys that
were just playing around.


Have you been playing around with little boys *again* Bert? For shame.
Krause, isn't there a jail cell with your name on it, Pedophile. Isn't
that why you left Florida and Virginia to get away from their strict
sexual predator laws?

Bert, how do you let yourself get sucked into this with Krause, et al?

Tweaking Harry, Don, Kevin and Doug every once in a while is a lot of fun.

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:21:56 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

Don White wrote:


Bert Robbins wrote:


Every time I make a post you, Don or Doug Kanter as respond. It
appears that the three of you need to get lives.


We consider it a public service......
somewhat like vermin control.

Well, you need to go back to school because you haven't been able
to exterminate me.


I said *control*, not extermination.
What do you think I am...the US military?

No, you are the Canadian government arresting a group of boys that
were just playing around.



Have you been playing around with little boys *again* Bert? For shame.

Krause, isn't there a jail cell with your name on it, Pedophile.
Isn't that why you left Florida and Virginia to get away from their
strict sexual predator laws?


Bert, how do you let yourself get sucked into this with Krause, et al?

Get sucked in??
Bert usually rides in from the blue...attacks a legitimate poster and
starts the troubles..... he's the instigator and just loves to have a
'facilitator' mosey on up to round out his posse.

Legitimate poster? What is a legitimate poster? This is USENET and
everyone is a legitimate poster.

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Have you been playing around with little boys *again* Bert? For shame.
Krause, isn't there a jail cell with your name on it, Pedophile.
Isn't that why you left Florida and Virginia to get away from their
strict sexual predator laws?

Bert, how do you let yourself get sucked into this with Krause, et al?

JohnH,

You have got to be kidding. Bert came to the NG and threw out his troll
with the desire to stir up a rash of ****. He did it all on his own,
and there were way too many regulars who loved jumping into it and
heaping a few more loads into the pile.

Recently the NG is resembling the NG of the past. Unfortunately we all
lose if some of the regulars prefer the inflammatory posts and NG
battles that were so common in the past.

I will be out of town on business and vacation for a while and I will
not be able to post until late into the first week of July. I'm sure
that rec.boats will have quite a few OT posts and illegitimate posters
while I am gone.

Be nice to each other.

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:21:56 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

Every time I make a post you, Don or Doug Kanter as respond.
It appears that the three of you need to get lives.

We consider it a public service......
somewhat like vermin control.
Well, you need to go back to school because you haven't been
able to exterminate me.

I said *control*, not extermination.
What do you think I am...the US military?
No, you are the Canadian government arresting a group of boys that
were just playing around.

Have you been playing around with little boys *again* Bert? For shame.
Krause, isn't there a jail cell with your name on it, Pedophile.
Isn't that why you left Florida and Virginia to get away from their
strict sexual predator laws?
Bert, how do you let yourself get sucked into this with Krause, et al?

Tweaking Harry, Don, Kevin and Doug every once in a while is a lot of
fun.


You don't have the ability to tweak the pimples on your nose, Bert.
You're just another common-as-dirt right-wing rectal opening.

I've got you responding to everyone of my posts. Why?

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:54:05 GMT, Don White wrote:


JimH wrote:


The wind blew, the crap flew, and in walked Herring, covered in denial.
You've been facilitating right-wing trash like Bert for years, Herring,
and each time you get nailed for it, you offer up the same old lame
excuse.



As Don asked earlier, I wonder when his Sheriff term expires?



This is a real problem for John.
If he wants the Office of Sheriff, he not only has to be fair to all
posters, he has to bend over backwards to give that impression.
At this point there are too many posters he continues to scrap with on a
regular basis. It's almost impossible for him not to show favoritism.
He probably should resign his self appointed office until he can conquer
his own demons.


Don, you make a much better impression when your posts are *immediately*
following Harry's.
--
John H



Thank you!

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

Bert Robbins wrote:


Tweaking Harry, Don, Kevin and Doug every once in a while is a lot of fun.

Thank you for admitting that you purposely try to agitate us for your
personal entertainment. Now let's see what the Sheriff does after your
public confession.

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:21:56 -0400, Bert Robbins
wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Don White wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

Every time I make a post you, Don or Doug Kanter as respond.
It appears that the three of you need to get lives.

We consider it a public service......
somewhat like vermin control.
Well, you need to go back to school because you haven't been
able to exterminate me.

I said *control*, not extermination.
What do you think I am...the US military?
No, you are the Canadian government arresting a group of boys
that were just playing around.

Have you been playing around with little boys *again* Bert? For
shame.
Krause, isn't there a jail cell with your name on it, Pedophile.
Isn't that why you left Florida and Virginia to get away from
their strict sexual predator laws?
Bert, how do you let yourself get sucked into this with Krause, et al?
Tweaking Harry, Don, Kevin and Doug every once in a while is a lot
of fun.

You don't have the ability to tweak the pimples on your nose, Bert.
You're just another common-as-dirt right-wing rectal opening.

I've got you responding to everyone of my posts. Why?


1. No, you don't.
2. Because common-as-dirt right-wing rectal openings don't deserve any
respect.

Do you think that people will believe you when you habit is to respond
to each and every message I post?

What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
 

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Bryan wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the
"scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right?

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html
They do have it right, Bert. Give the most logical explanation that
best fits the available evidence. When new evidence arises, adjust
the explanation to fit the evidence. Is there something wrong with
this objective approach to understanding our world?
Science is nothing more than observation and consensus. You observe
something and then you look for consensus of your observation by your
"peers." This consensus can be biased by political and economic
considerations.

Does the phrase "it is accepted in the scientific community" cause you
to sit up and say what do you mean "accepted?" It does with me because
it means that it is not all objective.

Newton needed no consensus, nor did Einstein.
Newton made an observation and then he had to gain consensus from his
fellow scientists to accept his observation.



And, if one scientist happens to be correct, but nobody else understands,
then he's wrong? Is that what you think?

That is what is called accepted science. And, that is how the system
works. It isn't right but it is pervasive in the scientific community.



Poor Albert. His ideas must be fluff.