![]() |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. I see that you are incapable of debating the issue. Just like Rush and Sean, when you can't bring real and honest data to the table, start childish name calling. |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
Capt John wrote: FishWisher wrote: Gosh, wouldn't it be refreshing to have them say, for a change, "We don't know"? They don't know. I don't know. But I do know they don't know the temperatures of a few hundred years ago - and certainly not a few thousand. I gotta think this whole warming nonsense is nothing more than a tool for those that wish our technology would just plain stop. Pure politics. I am old enough to remember when the same folks were spouting off about "global cooling". Go ahead - say "I don't know". Yeah, right. Dale Dale, Like you, I remember back in the 70's or 80's all the "experts" were talking about global cooling, all the news reports about the coming ice age, it was everywhere. And then the weather started getting warmer, and they stopped talking about the next ice age, and started talking about global warming. Didn't they blame it on the same gasses? I remember when they tried to blame it on Freon getting up there and destroying the ozone layer. One little problem, Freon's heavier than air, it stays down here with us, not up in the ozone layer, they stopped talking about it. Not true! even though is heavier than air, it will mix and by current, get into the stratosphere easily, when in it's gasseous state: http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/env99/env256.htm |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
|
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
|
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:42:02 -0400, Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. Bert, why don't you post where in the NAS's report they have revised any data from 400 years to 2000 years. Obviously, all of the mind changing, twisted logic, and (dis)information is coming from your "breitbart" source. Gene, I guess you missed the by lines of the articles where it said that the were AP (Associated Press wire service news articles). Does that change your view of the veracity of the articles or is the AP now a dis-information section of the RNC? Since you are relying on them for the "facts," why don't you explain the accuracy of their article: http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/0....07o4imol.html which was posted the same day as the NSA report? No I am not relying upon Brietbart, I am relying upon their sources which are AP and AFP (http://www.afp.com/english/afp/?pid=history) for the ariticles I referenced and the one you referenced. "AFP is the world's oldest established news agency, founded in 1835 by Charles-Louis Havas, the father of global journalism. Today, the agency continues to expand its operations worldwide, reaching thousands of subscribers via radio, television, newspapers and companies from its main headquarters in Paris and regional centers in Washington, Hong Kong, Nicosia and Montevideo. All share the same goal: to guarantee top quality international service tailored to the specific needs of clients in each region." They really seem to be challenged by the facts as much as Santorum was. You guys just don't value fact checking prior to disclosure very much do you? Gene you have stuck both feet in your mouth this time. If one of your left wing buddies had posted eigher |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. I see that you are incapable of debating the issue. Just like Rush and Sean, when you can't bring real and honest data to the table, start childish name calling. Kevin, have you been smoking what you grow in your parents basement lately? |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. .. Obviously, all of the mind changing, twisted logic, and (dis)information is coming from your "breitbart" source. Gene, I guess you missed the by lines of the articles where it said that the were AP (Associated Press wire service news articles). Does that change your view of the veracity of the articles or is the AP now a dis-information section of the RNC? OK - let me get this straight: - If you (and I mean YOU, not "someone") spent time interviewing a scientist, could you write an article in which you accurately represented what he had told you? It's a simple question. Yes, or no. |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: basskisser wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: Here we go again. It's only been a couple of hours and the the "scientists" are changing their minds. Will they ever get it right? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/D8IDK16G0.html They don't "change their minds". They interpret data. When they interpret previously unused data, things change. Have you ever altered your stance on something when you've been given proof that your previous mindset was wrong? Yes, I have altered my stance. At one time I thought you were just a mindless twit but, now I know you are a mindless twit. I see that you are incapable of debating the issue. Just like Rush and Sean, when you can't bring real and honest data to the table, start childish name calling. Kevin, have you been smoking what you grow in your parents basement lately? You just proved his point, Bertie. |
What Happened 2000 Years Ago?
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. Obviously, all of the mind changing, twisted logic, and (dis)information is coming from your "breitbart" source. Gene, I guess you missed the by lines of the articles where it said that the were AP (Associated Press wire service news articles). Does that change your view of the veracity of the articles or is the AP now a dis-information section of the RNC? OK - let me get this straight: - If you (and I mean YOU, not "someone") spent time interviewing a scientist, could you write an article in which you accurately represented what he had told you? Yes. It's a simple question. Yes, or no. Asked and answered. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com