| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
An on-topic political development
wrote in message
oups.com... wrote: The good news is that our political system worked, and the Administration responded to a widespread public concern when formatting the final policy. Although we can't operate motor boats in most of the national parks, we are probably better off as a result. Not wanting to opine the matter, but unless I'm missing something, 45000 people isn't really a great lobby barometer , let alone force that I would say could promote "a widespread public concern" , especially on a federal level. Or is it? 45,000 may have represented the majority of park users in a particular place. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Off topic but not political... | General | |||
| Off topic but not political... | General | |||
| Off topic but not political... | General | |||
| Media Bias Is Real, Finds UCLA Political Scientist | General | |||
| So where is...................... | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
