*This* chowda is delicious!
 

I like the tap dancing to the sound of bass and toms.

Whum, bubumba, boomba, bumba, boom, bubba boombobah....


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 18 Jun 2006 12:38:31 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:

start YOUR tapdance...

Um....ok....

tappity tap tap tappity tap tap tappity tap tap
tap tap tap tappity tap tap tap tappity tap tap tap

TA DA!!!

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 18 Jun 2006 12:38:31 -0700, "basskisser"
wrote:

start YOUR tapdance...

Um....ok....

tappity tap tap tappity tap tap tappity tap tap
tap tap tap tappity tap tap tap tappity tap tap tap

TA DA!!!

http://www.crafttoys.com/images/THHT...eSHORTver2.avi

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

Harry Krause wrote:
You white boys got no rhythm.

good thing too, otherwise I'd probably be makeing a fortune in show
business!

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
. ..

"basskisser" wrote in message

I said:
You frequent rec.boats and post lies, and idiotic statements for a
job???

To which you replied:

....like fish in a barrel.........

Now, do tell, what did you mean by that?

Good Lord, bassie, I was making reference to the old saying indicating
that something (like drawing you and your ire into a pointless post
exchange) is exceptionally easy, like shooting fish in a barrel. Surely
you've heard that old one?

Now, do tell -- please detail exactly how you made the logical connection
and progression from "...like fish in a barrel..." to an alleged
"admission" [your word] that I "...frequent rec.boats and post lies, and
idiotic statements for a job...". Multiple steps are OK, as long as they
are clearly delineated. I really want to follow this closely. :-)



He always has been a rather dim bulb in the marquee.

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

John Gaquin wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

Hmm, are you saying that you DON'T see the connection?? Really??

Really. Please illuminate.

This statement will speak volumns if you think about it.

"Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required.
Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't
clam
chowda. Period"

Now, dance...........

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

basskisser wrote:


Now, dance...........


Just for you , Bass...

http://www.fungrams.com/network/fishdance.shtml

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

basskisser wrote:
John Gaquin wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
Hmm, are you saying that you DON'T see the connection?? Really??
Really. Please illuminate.

This statement will speak volumns if you think about it.

"Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required.
Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't
clam
chowda. Period"

Now, dance...........


Bassy,
I hope you know I am being serious and am not trying to tweak you, but
has anyone told you you see everything in black or white, which limits
your ability to understand what the person was actually saying, or at
least you seem to in Usenet? It seems you sometimes miss the subtle
tones of humor or sarcasm often expressed in Usenet.

--
Reggie

That's my story and I am sticking to it!

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
John Gaquin wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
Hmm, are you saying that you DON'T see the connection?? Really??
Really. Please illuminate.
This statement will speak volumns if you think about it.

"Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required.
Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't
clam
chowda. Period"

Now, dance...........

Bassy,
I hope you know I am being serious and am not trying to tweak you, but
has anyone told you you see everything in black or white, which limits
your ability to understand what the person was actually saying, or at
least you seem to in Usenet? It seems you sometimes miss the subtle
tones of humor or sarcasm often expressed in Usenet.

--
Reggie

His first statement was not, and I repeat NOT tongue in cheek, and he
knows it. Only after being shown he was dead wrong, did he start
dancing.



This discussion long again passed into the Who Gives a **** trash can.
Why are you perpetuating it? Why do you care so much about such inanities?

Because I finish what I start. You don't have to read it if you don't
want.

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

On 19 Jun 2006 06:19:31 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
John Gaquin wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
Hmm, are you saying that you DON'T see the connection?? Really??
Really. Please illuminate.
This statement will speak volumns if you think about it.

"Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required.
Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't
clam
chowda. Period"

Now, dance...........

Bassy,
I hope you know I am being serious and am not trying to tweak you, but
has anyone told you you see everything in black or white, which limits
your ability to understand what the person was actually saying, or at
least you seem to in Usenet? It seems you sometimes miss the subtle
tones of humor or sarcasm often expressed in Usenet.

--
Reggie

His first statement was not, and I repeat NOT tongue in cheek, and he
knows it. Only after being shown he was dead wrong, did he start
dancing.



This discussion long again passed into the Who Gives a **** trash can.
Why are you perpetuating it? Why do you care so much about such inanities?

Because I finish what I start. You don't have to read it if you don't
want.

BK, I honestly believe this topic was not worth your *starting* on. Let it
go, and take a joke.
--
John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

*This* chowda is delicious!
 

JohnH wrote:
On 19 Jun 2006 06:19:31 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
John Gaquin wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
Hmm, are you saying that you DON'T see the connection?? Really??
Really. Please illuminate.
This statement will speak volumns if you think about it.

"Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required.
Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't
clam
chowda. Period"

Now, dance...........

Bassy,
I hope you know I am being serious and am not trying to tweak you, but
has anyone told you you see everything in black or white, which limits
your ability to understand what the person was actually saying, or at
least you seem to in Usenet? It seems you sometimes miss the subtle
tones of humor or sarcasm often expressed in Usenet.

--
Reggie

His first statement was not, and I repeat NOT tongue in cheek, and he
knows it. Only after being shown he was dead wrong, did he start
dancing.



This discussion long again passed into the Who Gives a **** trash can.
Why are you perpetuating it? Why do you care so much about such inanities?

Because I finish what I start. You don't have to read it if you don't
want.

BK, I honestly believe this topic was not worth your *starting* on. Let it
go, and take a joke.
--
John H

John, if you recall, it was a decent topic, covered in many decent ways
until John Gaquin stepped in. Why am I all of a sudden to blame?