This has to be about the tenth ruling in Canada's favour over the
softwood lumber dispute.
Does anyone in the Bush administration have a lick of sense or shred of
decency , or the gonads to 'do the right thing'?
http://tinyurl.com/majne

'do the right thing'?

They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want.

Bill Kearney wrote:
'do the right thing'?


They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want.

Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel.
How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd
screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber.

Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel.
How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd
screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber.

It's more like 'Canada? Lumber? Who cares.'

Bill Kearney wrote:
Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel.
How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd
screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber.


It's more like 'Canada? Lumber? Who cares.'


Obviously someone cares..or it wouldn't be in dispute for the last four
years.

Bill Kearney wrote:
'do the right thing'?

They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want.

Then why did the panel, that was comprised of two Canadians, and THREE
Americans come to a unanimous decision?

Don White wrote:
This has to be about the tenth ruling in Canada's favour over the
softwood lumber dispute.
Does anyone in the Bush administration have a lick of sense or shred of
decency , or the gonads to 'do the right thing'?
http://tinyurl.com/majne

Short answer: No.