![]() |
Canada wins again
This has to be about the tenth ruling in Canada's favour over the
softwood lumber dispute. Does anyone in the Bush administration have a lick of sense or shred of decency , or the gonads to 'do the right thing'? http://tinyurl.com/majne |
Canada wins again
'do the right thing'?
They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want. |
Canada wins again
Bill Kearney wrote:
'do the right thing'? They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want. Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel. How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber. |
Canada wins again
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:36:02 GMT, Don White wrote: Bill Kearney wrote: 'do the right thing'? They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want. Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel. How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber. I don't understand this. How is Canadian lumber "cheaper" than that we buy here in the states. Our currencies are almost equal nowadays, the cost have to be higher in Canada if only because of fuel pricing among other things. How is it that Canadian lumber is cheaper unless it's subsidized somehow? Not looking to start a fight, just trying to understand the economics. I would guess that the supply might be a bit thin in your backyard....encouraging companies to maximize profits. In Canada's west, a lot of lumber is cut from Crown Lands, where the lumber companies pay a stumpage fee. (Americans say not high enough) Here in Nova Scotia, it's mostly private woodlot owners...and we're not affected by the American penalties. The bottom line...We can save the average US homebuilder money if your gov't would play by the rules. |
Canada wins again
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:57:21 GMT, Don White wrote: Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 14:36:02 GMT, Don White wrote: Bill Kearney wrote: 'do the right thing'? They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want. Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel. How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber. I don't understand this. How is Canadian lumber "cheaper" than that we buy here in the states. Our currencies are almost equal nowadays, the cost have to be higher in Canada if only because of fuel pricing among other things. How is it that Canadian lumber is cheaper unless it's subsidized somehow? Not looking to start a fight, just trying to understand the economics. I would guess that the supply might be a bit thin in your backyard....encouraging companies to maximize profits. In Canada's west, a lot of lumber is cut from Crown Lands, where the lumber companies pay a stumpage fee. (Americans say not high enough) Here in Nova Scotia, it's mostly private woodlot owners...and we're not affected by the American penalties. The bottom line...We can save the average US homebuilder money if your gov't would play by the rules. I still don't understand it - I'll have to read up on it. You'll probably find lobbyists from Oregon & Washington state might have had something to do with it. |
Canada wins again
Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel.
How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber. It's more like 'Canada? Lumber? Who cares.' |
Canada wins again
Bill Kearney wrote:
Or the sensible Americans on the NAFTA arbritation panel. How can you expect countries in the Mid East to trust you when you'd screw your 'friends' at the drop of a piece of lumber. It's more like 'Canada? Lumber? Who cares.' Obviously someone cares..or it wouldn't be in dispute for the last four years. |
Canada wins again
Don White wrote: This has to be about the tenth ruling in Canada's favour over the softwood lumber dispute. Does anyone in the Bush administration have a lick of sense or shred of decency , or the gonads to 'do the right thing'? http://tinyurl.com/majne Short answer: No. |
Canada wins again
Bill Kearney wrote: 'do the right thing'? They already are, it's just not the thing the canadians want. Then why did the panel, that was comprised of two Canadians, and THREE Americans come to a unanimous decision? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com