On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 02:38:45 +0000, NOYB wrote:


http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200412/fallows



Thanks.

Yeah, I found it quite interesting, and probably, somewhat accurate as to
how these decisions are made.

But as the article says: "You can never assume that just because a
government knows something is unviable, it won't go ahead and do it."

As unattractive as the options are, they're still better than a nuclear
Iran.

IMO, our President just left an even greater threat, Pakistan. Dr. Khan
has already done tremendous damage.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040308fa_fact

And, perhaps, we, ourselves, are not without blame.

http://www.counterpunch.org/hallinan02032006.html