Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?


Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!


I agree 100%!

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:


Fred thinks it is a good idea to turn US port security over the the United
Arab Emirates.


He may be right, considering who has been running it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peninsu...gation_Company
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?

On 21 Feb 2006 11:17:30 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!


I agree 100%!


Me too (trying to be as non-political as possible).
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Fred Dehl wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
oups.com:

Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!
I agree 100%!


Absolutely - I mean it's been proven with total certainty that every Arab
is an uncivilized, bloodthirsty mongrel hellbent on turning the US into a
3,000-mile-wide Circle-K.



Fred thinks it is a good idea to turn US port security over the the
United Arab Emirates.


Not security, operations.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?

"The UAE is a drug transshipment point for traffickers given its proximity
to Southwest Asian drug producing countries; the UAE's position as a major
financial center makes it vulnerable to money laundering;
anti-money-laundering controls improving".

Maybe they want to expand their operations, if you know what I mean.




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?


"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Fred Dehl wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
oups.com:

Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!
I agree 100%!

Absolutely - I mean it's been proven with total certainty that every
Arab
is an uncivilized, bloodthirsty mongrel hellbent on turning the US into
a
3,000-mile-wide Circle-K.



Fred thinks it is a good idea to turn US port security over the the
United Arab Emirates.


Not security, operations.


Since the NSA (theoretically) only monitors phonecalls to naughty countries,
I wonder if bad guys already here (like in Florida or New Jersey) could make
private calls to offices in Baltimore, once their pals are set up as port
managers.


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:49:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Fred Dehl wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
oups.com:

Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!
I agree 100%!

Absolutely - I mean it's been proven with total certainty that every
Arab
is an uncivilized, bloodthirsty mongrel hellbent on turning the US into
a
3,000-mile-wide Circle-K.


Fred thinks it is a good idea to turn US port security over the the
United Arab Emirates.


Not security, operations.


Since the NSA (theoretically) only monitors phonecalls to naughty countries,
I wonder if bad guys already here (like in Florida or New Jersey) could make
private calls to offices in Baltimore, once their pals are set up as port
managers.


Do you not think there may be some bad guys there right now? We don't have
a rule prohibiting Muslims from being supervisors at our ports.
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?


"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:49:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:51 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

Fred Dehl wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
oups.com:

Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!
I agree 100%!

Absolutely - I mean it's been proven with total certainty that every
Arab
is an uncivilized, bloodthirsty mongrel hellbent on turning the US
into
a
3,000-mile-wide Circle-K.


Fred thinks it is a good idea to turn US port security over the the
United Arab Emirates.

Not security, operations.


Since the NSA (theoretically) only monitors phonecalls to naughty
countries,
I wonder if bad guys already here (like in Florida or New Jersey) could
make
private calls to offices in Baltimore, once their pals are set up as port
managers.


Do you not think there may be some bad guys there right now? We don't have
a rule prohibiting Muslims from being supervisors at our ports.


I'm sure there are. But, I see no reason to make their job easier. The UAE
is theoretically a country that's friendly to us, at least according to the
CIA's web site. But, the CIA's got an exquisite knack for misunderstanding
the world, so I really question the idea of turning over ownership of
anything important to a Muslim country, especially when said country could
probably be OBL's next target.


  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
basskisser
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?


Fred Dehl wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
oups.com:


Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!


I agree 100%!


Absolutely - I mean it's been proven with total certainty that every Arab
is an uncivilized, bloodthirsty mongrel hellbent on turning the US into a
3,000-mile-wide Circle-K. In fact, the reason why Casey Kasem lost the
American Top 40 gig is that it was discovered that every time he says,
"Long Distance Dedication", when you play it backwards, he's actually
saying "Bomb the infidels - praise be to Allah". Also if you look at the
wrinkles in F. Murray Abraham's makeup in the last scene of "Amadeus", you
can make out the words "Death to America" as well as see a map of the
Middle East without an Israel.


You just don't get it, do you?

  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking?

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:01:50 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:49:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:51 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

Fred Dehl wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in
oups.com:

Gene Kearns wrote:
No matter what side of the aisle you sit on, this is just nuts!
I agree 100%!

Absolutely - I mean it's been proven with total certainty that every
Arab
is an uncivilized, bloodthirsty mongrel hellbent on turning the US
into
a
3,000-mile-wide Circle-K.


Fred thinks it is a good idea to turn US port security over the the
United Arab Emirates.

Not security, operations.

Since the NSA (theoretically) only monitors phonecalls to naughty
countries,
I wonder if bad guys already here (like in Florida or New Jersey) could
make
private calls to offices in Baltimore, once their pals are set up as port
managers.


Do you not think there may be some bad guys there right now? We don't have
a rule prohibiting Muslims from being supervisors at our ports.


I'm sure there are. But, I see no reason to make their job easier. The UAE
is theoretically a country that's friendly to us, at least according to the
CIA's web site. But, the CIA's got an exquisite knack for misunderstanding
the world, so I really question the idea of turning over ownership of
anything important to a Muslim country, especially when said country could
probably be OBL's next target.


Where did 'ownership' come into the picture?
--
'Til next time,

John H

******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? [email protected] General 20 February 22nd 06 07:48 PM
On Topic... What the hell is this adminstration thinking? Doug Kanter General 0 February 21st 06 04:28 PM
Best Topic of 2005 Bryan General 3 January 15th 06 12:56 PM
So where is...................... *JimH* General 186 November 28th 05 02:29 PM
This newsgroup is at least 71% off topic posts - TAKE IT SOMEPLACE ELSE! Chuck Tribolet General 8 November 14th 05 05:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017