LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
K. Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why Optimax is not true DFI

Why is that the case? the optimax injects directly into the cylinder ?
And why does it make it more reliable?

P.S.

one of my theories about ETec vs 4stroke vs optimax is that the Etec
seems to be using slightly (5-15%) gas. Which may be because of its
"nosed" piston which helps efficiency at low rpm but not at high rpm.

Lets not even go into the BRP claims it is more efficient .. which are
measured at idle speed and true... But also at that rpm and fuel use
even 50% more would be irrelelvant.



Matt


Sorry Matt I missed this one.

The Optimaxes are not true DFI (as in, Direct into the combustion
chamber Fuel Injection);

(i) they have a second inlet manifold between the air pump & a large
electronic fuel/air mixture injector (inlet valve).

(ii) The "fuel" is actually injected into this second inlet manifold.
with "normal" fuel injectors from a pretty much normal fuel rail
(slightly higher fuel rail pressure).

(iii) The fuel is therefore better atomised not much different from
normal 4 strokes fuel fuel injection & the same as a 4 stroke's
injection the fuel can get further atomised in a mostly hot (compressed
air) manifold before

(iv) an inlet valve opens & allows the fuel air mixture to flow into the
combustion chamber.

The reasons Optimaxes were better but still unsuccessful as OB engines,
were;

(v) the fuel was better atomised & a better mixture was allowed into the
chamber (though still way too lean), also

(vi) the injectors themselves were not subjected to the rigors of the
combustion chamber although the electronic inlet valve (air fuel mixture
injector) was & just as with Ficht they contributed to the reliability
or lack thereof making them failures from a commercial sense.

If any confirmation were needed after OMC, that low pressure DFI using
lean mixtures up into the mid power range doesn't work, take a look at
the Optimaxes & Ficht type systems. They could not be more different in
their execution of basically the same idea, extremely lean mixtures at
low revs fired directly around the spark plug even just to get ignition
(in ficht like systems they even have to just leave the plug
firing!!:-)) Yet they both suffered way too high failure rates for
consumer usage, gee they'd be too unreliable even as specialty race engines.

K
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Verado V Optimax Oscar General 0 January 31st 06 09:43 PM
FS: 2000 PROLINE 30 EXPRESS T/225 Mercury Optimax in Seaford, NY (Long Island) [email protected] Marketplace 0 January 4th 06 06:43 PM
True "true wind" & the Raymarine ST60, or other b393capt Electronics 23 December 23rd 05 12:33 AM
FS: 2000 PROLINE 30 EXPRESS T/225 Mercury Optimax in Seaford, NY (Long Island) [email protected] Marketplace 0 November 2nd 05 08:14 PM
Q: Winter storage - Optimax 175 OB B General 3 October 26th 05 05:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017