With twin 150 gallon tanks, I already knew this. What sort of illusory
plan was floated in order to wean us from this nasty drug?

Just say no??

jps

"jps" wrote in message
...
With twin 150 gallon tanks, I already knew this. What sort of illusory
plan was floated in order to wean us from this nasty drug?

Just say no??


The best way to break this addiction is through technology. Since 2001, we
have spent nearly $10 billion to develop cleaner, cheaper and more reliable
alternative energy sources. And we are on the threshold of incredible
advances.

So tonight I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative -- a 22 percent
increase in clean-energy research at the Department of Energy to push for
breakthroughs in two vital areas. To change how we power our homes and
offices, we will invest more in zero-emission coal-fired plants;
revolutionary solar and wind technologies; and clean, safe nuclear energy.

We must also change how we power our automobiles.

We will increase our research in better batteries for hybrid and electric
cars and in pollution-free cars that run on hydrogen.

We will also fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing
ethanol, not just from corn but from wood chips and stalks or switch grass.

Our goal is to make this new kind of ethanol practical and competitive
within six years.

Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach another
great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the
Middle East by 2025.

By applying the talent and technology of America, this country can
dramatically improve our environment, move beyond a petroleum- based economy
and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bush almost sounded like algore, eh?

With twin 150 gallon tanks, I already knew this. What sort of illusory
plan was floated in order to wean us from this nasty drug?

Just say no??


Our boat also has two 150 gallon tanks but with 1500+ mile
range, I don't feel we are "addicted."


NOYB wrote:
The best way to break this addiction is through technology. Since 2001, we
have spent nearly $10 billion to develop cleaner, cheaper and more reliable
alternative energy sources.....



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bush almost sounded like algore, eh?


Only he mispronounced some of the big words, and he displays
a sense of humor.

DSK

In article ,
says...
With twin 150 gallon tanks, I already knew this. What sort of illusory
plan was floated in order to wean us from this nasty drug?

Just say no??


Our boat also has two 150 gallon tanks but with 1500+ mile
range, I don't feel we are "addicted."

I always hated the smell of diesel exhaust, still do. I might find a
reason to put up with it in the future.

Gasoline was $1.33 when we purchased our gas hog.

jps

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
With twin 150 gallon tanks, I already knew this. What sort of illusory
plan was floated in order to wean us from this nasty drug?

Just say no??


Our boat also has two 150 gallon tanks but with 1500+ mile
range, I don't feel we are "addicted."

I always hated the smell of diesel exhaust, still do. I might find a
reason to put up with it in the future.

Gasoline was $1.33 when we purchased our gas hog.

jps

Few modern diesels stink much anymore while underway (unless there's
something wrong). I can smell mine when I first start them at the dock, but
once underway and they warm up nobody has ever noticed any smell, even with
a stiff following wind.

RCE

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:42:29 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach
another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports
from the Middle East by 2025.

I don't want to rain on your parade, but do you know how much of our oil
imports come from the middle east? Now if he had said 75% of all our
imports . . .

It's nice to see your side coming around to an old idea. Carter proposed
complete energy independence by 2000, but then Reagan believed the market
would solve the problem and dismantled Carter's programs.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:42:29 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach
another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports
from the Middle East by 2025.

I don't want to rain on your parade, but do you know how much of our oil
imports come from the middle east? Now if he had said 75% of all our
imports . . .


I don't believe the continuation of oil imported from Canada and Mexico is
particularly in jeopardy. But the Middle East is a powder keg.

Europe gets 30% of its oil from the Middle East, and Japan gets 2/3 of its
oil from there. If the Middle East falls into total chaos, and al Qaeda
gets control of the oil, the ripple effect felt here would be horrendous.

There's not just a US oil market. There's a world oil market. And a
problem in one supply area affects prices everywhere.

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:26:57 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:42:29 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach
another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports
from the Middle East by 2025.

I don't want to rain on your parade, but do you know how much of our
oil imports come from the middle east? Now if he had said 75% of all
our imports . . .


I don't believe the continuation of oil imported from Canada and Mexico
is particularly in jeopardy. But the Middle East is a powder keg.

Europe gets 30% of its oil from the Middle East, and Japan gets 2/3 of
its oil from there. If the Middle East falls into total chaos, and al
Qaeda gets control of the oil, the ripple effect felt here would be
horrendous.

There's not just a US oil market. There's a world oil market. And a
problem in one supply area affects prices everywhere.

I'm not denying that, but if memory serves, we get around 12% of our oil
from the middle east. Cutting that my 75% is better that a sharp stick in
the eye, but it ain't going to change the oil situation by very much.

I also have my doubts about ethanol. Our agriculture sector is very oil
intensive, fertilizers, tractors, transport, etc. It's my limited
understanding that there isn't much of an oil savings by using ethanol.

"thunder" wrote in message
...

I also have my doubts about ethanol. Our agriculture sector is very oil
intensive, fertilizers, tractors, transport, etc. It's my limited
understanding that there isn't much of an oil savings by using ethanol.

Plus, ethanol is proving to have a bigger pollution problem than gas.

RCE

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:26:57 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:42:29 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach
another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports
from the Middle East by 2025.

I don't want to rain on your parade, but do you know how much of our
oil imports come from the middle east? Now if he had said 75% of all
our imports . . .


I don't believe the continuation of oil imported from Canada and Mexico
is particularly in jeopardy. But the Middle East is a powder keg.

Europe gets 30% of its oil from the Middle East, and Japan gets 2/3 of
its oil from there. If the Middle East falls into total chaos, and al
Qaeda gets control of the oil, the ripple effect felt here would be
horrendous.

There's not just a US oil market. There's a world oil market. And a
problem in one supply area affects prices everywhere.

I'm not denying that, but if memory serves, we get around 12% of our oil
from the middle east.

I believe it's 20%...but I'll have to check.

Cutting that my 75% is better that a sharp stick in
the eye, but it ain't going to change the oil situation by very much.


Sure it would. We consume 20,000,000 barrels per day.

20% of 20 million is 400,000 barrels/day. There are probably only two dozen
other countries that consume more than that in a day.



I also have my doubts about ethanol. Our agriculture sector is very oil
intensive, fertilizers, tractors, transport, etc. It's my limited
understanding that there isn't much of an oil savings by using ethanol.

I believe I heard that too.