Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: Skipper's not your average troll. He often has exhibited a level of above average intelligence in some of his posts and has occasionally contributed some interesting POVs on subjects kicked around here. RCE There is a small minority who seem to have one goal, to drag this group into the gutter. It's a shame. Then I take it you're for a democratically administered and monitored rec.boats. Or can we count you among the minority preferring continued anarchy? -- Skipper I think it's the majority that reject your monitoring Skippy. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
I think it's the majority that reject your monitoring Skippy. I never proffered being the monitor, Don. I did suggest a committee of *NG elected* monitors to restore the NG to its previously interesting open and far more civil format. We would *all* decide just what that format would be in the month of discussion and voting on the charter. I suspect the end result would be far less political and flame throwing threads. Suspect I'd have a far easier time abiding by a responsible NG charter than you would, however. Some of us would find ourselves severely challenged if we primarily discussed boats 'n boating, eh, Don? -- Skipper |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:11:30 -0600, Skipper wrote:
Don White wrote: I think it's the majority that reject your monitoring Skippy. I never proffered being the monitor, Don. I did suggest a committee of *NG elected* monitors to restore the NG to its previously interesting open and far more civil format. We would *all* decide just what that format would be in the month of discussion and voting on the charter. I suspect the end result would be far less political and flame throwing threads. Suspect I'd have a far easier time abiding by a responsible NG charter than you would, however. Some of us would find ourselves severely challenged if we primarily discussed boats 'n boating, eh, Don? Skipper, Chuck posted a challenge that many of us accepted and have tried to maintain. A few have decided they'd rather sling mud. Is rec.boats.cruising a 'monitored' group? I think not. Yet they manage quite well. Why? How often do you see a political/religious thread over there? How often do you see a political/religious thread here that doesn't become a name-calling free-for-all. Monitor yourself. Urge others to monitor themselves. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
Is rec.boats.cruising a 'monitored' group? I think not. Yet they manage quite well. Why? How often do you see a political/religious thread over there? How often do you see a political/religious thread here that doesn't become a name-calling free-for-all. It just won't work here, John...for many reasons. The only hope for alt.sailing.asa and this NG is democratic monitoring. Monitors who allow off-topic, differing views and lively discussions, but keep it within bounds. I think we all know when it goes to far. Sans monitors, there's just no reasonable way to bring it back from the small-minded off-topic chatroom and flamefest it has become. -- Skipper |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:27:02 -0600, Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: Is rec.boats.cruising a 'monitored' group? I think not. Yet they manage quite well. Why? How often do you see a political/religious thread over there? How often do you see a political/religious thread here that doesn't become a name-calling free-for-all. It just won't work here, John...for many reasons. The only hope for alt.sailing.asa and this NG is democratic monitoring. Monitors who allow off-topic, differing views and lively discussions, but keep it within bounds. I think we all know when it goes to far. Sans monitors, there's just no reasonable way to bring it back from the small-minded off-topic chatroom and flamefest it has become. I made no mention of alt.sailing.asa. Never been there. I mentioned rec.boats.cruising. You've been there. It's not monitored. It doesn't suffer the problems of this group. Why? We have a small minority of posters who are trollers. We have a small minority of posters who can't resist getting hooked. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
Skipper wrote: It just won't work here, John...for many reasons. The only hope for alt.sailing.asa and this NG is democratic monitoring. Monitors who allow off-topic, differing views and lively discussions, but keep it within bounds. I think we all know when it goes to far. Sans monitors, there's just no reasonable way to bring it back from the small-minded off-topic chatroom and flamefest it has become. We have a small minority of posters who are trollers. We have a small minority of posters who can't resist getting hooked. Small minority? Actually, it's the *majority* of those still posting to this NG. I recently polled a sampling of NG regulars, contributors to other boating NGs, and past rec.boats contributors. The response was revealing; no current rec.boats posters were in favor of moderating the flame, almost all past contributors and contributors to other boating groups favored moderation. When in Rome... And a good Skipper has a realistic eye to the weather. This and alt.sailing.asa *are* the NGs for boating trollers. Krause made that happen. -- Skipper |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: Skipper wrote: It just won't work here, John...for many reasons. The only hope for alt.sailing.asa and this NG is democratic monitoring. Monitors who allow off-topic, differing views and lively discussions, but keep it within bounds. I think we all know when it goes to far. Sans monitors, there's just no reasonable way to bring it back from the small-minded off-topic chatroom and flamefest it has become. We have a small minority of posters who are trollers. We have a small minority of posters who can't resist getting hooked. Small minority? Actually, it's the *majority* of those still posting to this NG. I recently polled a sampling of NG regulars, contributors to other boating NGs, and past rec.boats contributors. The response was revealing; no current rec.boats posters were in favor of moderating the flame, almost all past contributors and contributors to other boating groups favored moderation. When in Rome... And a good Skipper has a realistic eye to the weather. This and alt.sailing.asa *are* the NGs for boating trollers. Krause made that happen. -- Skipper So Harry controls your behavior? What does that say about you? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:57:19 -0600, Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: Skipper wrote: It just won't work here, John...for many reasons. The only hope for alt.sailing.asa and this NG is democratic monitoring. Monitors who allow off-topic, differing views and lively discussions, but keep it within bounds. I think we all know when it goes to far. Sans monitors, there's just no reasonable way to bring it back from the small-minded off-topic chatroom and flamefest it has become. We have a small minority of posters who are trollers. We have a small minority of posters who can't resist getting hooked. Small minority? Actually, it's the *majority* of those still posting to this NG. I recently polled a sampling of NG regulars, contributors to other boating NGs, and past rec.boats contributors. The response was revealing; no current rec.boats posters were in favor of moderating the flame, almost all past contributors and contributors to other boating groups favored moderation. When in Rome... And a good Skipper has a realistic eye to the weather. This and alt.sailing.asa *are* the NGs for boating trollers. Krause made that happen. You made your moderating post in rec.boats.cruising and got laughed out of the group. Now you're saying 'almost all...contributors...were in favor..." That's garbage. There are four or five regular trollers here. I would consider you one of them. They are certainly not the 'majority'. Most of the trollers are also the 'hookees', and just keep the crap flowing. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skipper wrote:
Don White wrote: I think it's the majority that reject your monitoring Skippy. I never proffered being the monitor, Don. I did suggest a committee of *NG elected* monitors to restore the NG to its previously interesting open and far more civil format. We would *all* decide just what that format would be in the month of discussion and voting on the charter. I suspect the end result would be far less political and flame throwing threads. Suspect I'd have a far easier time abiding by a responsible NG charter than you would, however. Some of us would find ourselves severely challenged if we primarily discussed boats 'n boating, eh, Don? -- Skipper I'd probably be reduced to reading and regurgitating other sailors adventures...such as cruises in exotic locations like.....the Sea of Cortes etc. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Floriduh - A Passing Fad | General | |||
Floriduh Boat Service | General | |||
Ping: Dr. Happy Tooth | General | |||
Millions for the Taking in Floriduh | General |