"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...


We have a cure for the energy problem. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS! But
the enviro's got the building of same, outlawed.

No knee-jerk reactions, OK? Forget Yucca Mountain.

As it stands now, we are unable to control nuclear waste. I did not
say "dispose of". I said "CONTROL", meaning assure that is secured
against misuse. When we can do that, then MAYBE we can build nuclear
power plants the was Starbucks builds coffee shops.


Why worry about the control of the waste?

Step 1) Grab a Kleenex and wipe the drool off your chin.

Step 2) On the way home, buy the February issue of Scientific American.

Step 3) Read the article on managing unsecured nuclear materials.



Read the rest of the post you snipped!


I read it, and then snipped it to make the next message less cluttered.
The things you said are only distantly related to the worst threats
regarding nuclear materials. Go back to step 2 and buy the magazine.
You'll probably be interested and surprised, as I was. I'd post the text,
but I don't subscribe to the digital version, which is $39.


Yucca mt can be protected. but there is so much nuclear material out there
in bombs, etc and rogue states with nuclear reactors, the worry is more when
do the nut cases get it, the do they get the material.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news "Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...


We have a cure for the energy problem. NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS! But
the enviro's got the building of same, outlawed.

No knee-jerk reactions, OK? Forget Yucca Mountain.

As it stands now, we are unable to control nuclear waste. I did not
say "dispose of". I said "CONTROL", meaning assure that is secured
against misuse. When we can do that, then MAYBE we can build nuclear
power plants the was Starbucks builds coffee shops.


Why worry about the control of the waste?

Step 1) Grab a Kleenex and wipe the drool off your chin.

Step 2) On the way home, buy the February issue of Scientific American.

Step 3) Read the article on managing unsecured nuclear materials.



Read the rest of the post you snipped!


I read it, and then snipped it to make the next message less cluttered.
The things you said are only distantly related to the worst threats
regarding nuclear materials. Go back to step 2 and buy the magazine.
You'll probably be interested and surprised, as I was. I'd post the text,
but I don't subscribe to the digital version, which is $39.


Yucca mt can be protected. but there is so much nuclear material out
there in bombs, etc and rogue states with nuclear reactors, the worry is
more when do the nut cases get it, the do they get the material.


You keep saying these things about storage, but that's not the point. Buy
the magazine. There are things in the article you and I were completely
unaware of. Do *are* interested in learning something new every 12 hours,
aren't you? Or, have you picked out your gravestone already? There's nothing
in between the two.