JimH wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:26:46 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:25:14 -0500, " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT
comREMOVETHIS wrote:

The *Challenge*: Perhaps it is time to revisit this issue since the
original *Challenge* a month or so ago.

I am not disputing the validity of that original challenge but I do have
some comments and suggestions.

Since that *Challenge* this NG is dripping wet with tensions because of
the
various mandates placed on it and the participation has actually
*decreased*
as a result of it.

I am not suggesting that the *Challenge* was wrong but that we need to
perhaps revisit the restrictions it called for as it is obvious it has
not
worked, including the netcopping of those mandates. I suggest that
this
new and improved atmosphere has made the NG stale and perhaps even more
confrontational.

Suggestions:

1. Stop all netcopping Ignore those who don't abide by the *rules*
here
(most important!)
2. Allow any sort of topic to be posted but make sure it is marked as
OT
Then refer back to #1.
3. Stop the personal attacks and insults.
4. Stop the flaming.
5. Stop the trolling for heated arguments.
6. Ignore those who do not abide by these rules.

Do those things and we are fine. Keep on as we are and we are nothing
better than what we were.

:-)

Chuck's challenge was right on.
--
John H
So why not live it John rather than depending on flaming folks at
alternate
NG's?

Actually, *my* challenge is more appropriate and easier to live by.

Do you sign on John?

Read Chuck's response. It makes good sense. *None* of us should be
name-callers.
--
John H


Agreed.

And none of us should insult, personally attack or flame
others.............agreed?

While on that subject, none of us should be telling us what is right to post
here while doing the same...............agreed?

So...........................the netcopping needs to
stop....................agreed?


JimH,
Let me cut and paste your last two sentences and see if you see yourself
in this:

While on that subject, none of us should be telling us what is right
to post
here while doing the same...............agreed?

So...........................the netcopping needs to
stop....................agreed?

In the first sentence you tell everyone that no one should be telling us
what is right to post here. In the very next sentence you are telling
everyone what they can post in here.

Chucks recommendations that was supported by 99% of the regulars is the
correct path to follow.


--
Reggie
************************************************** *************

Q. What's the difference between a brown-noser and a ****-head?
A. Depth perception.
************************************************** *************