"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

JimH wrote:

"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
thlink.net...

wrote:

JimH wrote:


.................inconsistent.

I was *officially* reprimanded by some folks here for posting a non
political article about a current event. Everyone participating in
the
discussion offered reasonable comments and there were not flames. OK.
Fair
enough. This is a boating NG.

I continue to read numerous posts/threads about cameras, photography,
dogs,
pigs, etc. (non boating). However, I read no reprimands about those
posts.

A bit confusing. Very inconsistent.

Could someone please explain what the new and improved *rules* of this
NG
are?


How about *do unto others as you would have them do unto you*?
One of your problems, Jim, is that you preach to the choir, then don't
heed your own advice.


How about "practice what you preach", Kevin? Notice the clever use of
those fancy quotation marks?


I was thinking the exact same thing Dan. Kevin has flamed me several
times
today.

"Do unto others........" How funny.


Here we go again, Jim is doing his damnest to flame me. It starts with
him calling me kevin, then goes on from there. Next he'll be lying
about others, etc.



"Others" choose to post their real name or a screen name. People respond
to them, at times, by the name they use. You chose *Kevin Noble* and, if
I have to do it for the third time, I can post a copy of that.

I know, you are "borrowing" someone's name, right? Doesn't that seem
really, really stupid by now, Kevin?

Dan


I don't know how I can "flame" someone by using the name he chose to use in
an email address.

Regardless, I shall call him Bassy from now on. Besides, except for a
couple of posts over the past few days he has been trying to behave.

JohnH wrote:

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:40:13 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


wrote:


JimH wrote:


"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
rthlink.net...


wrote:


JimH wrote:



.................inconsistent.

I was *officially* reprimanded by some folks here for posting a non
political article about a current event. Everyone participating in the
discussion offered reasonable comments and there were not flames. OK.
Fair
enough. This is a boating NG.

I continue to read numerous posts/threads about cameras, photography,
dogs,
pigs, etc. (non boating). However, I read no reprimands about those
posts.

A bit confusing. Very inconsistent.

Could someone please explain what the new and improved *rules* of this NG
are?


How about *do unto others as you would have them do unto you*?
One of your problems, Jim, is that you preach to the choir, then don't
heed your own advice.


How about "practice what you preach", Kevin? Notice the clever use of
those fancy quotation marks?


I was thinking the exact same thing Dan. Kevin has flamed me several times
today.

"Do unto others........" How funny.


Here we go again, Jim is doing his damnest to flame me. It starts with
him calling me kevin, then goes on from there. Next he'll be lying
about others, etc.



"Others" choose to post their real name or a screen name. People
respond to them, at times, by the name they use. You chose *Kevin
Noble* and, if I have to do it for the third time, I can post a copy of
that.

I know, you are "borrowing" someone's name, right? Doesn't that seem
really, really stupid by now, Kevin?

Dan


I sure hope bassie ignores that post.

We won't know until Monday. Tuesday if he is off for MLK day.

Dan

Dan Krueger wrote:



We won't know until Monday. Tuesday if he is off for MLK day.

Dan


Don't you have a house somewhere that needs haunting...Krueger?

Don White wrote:

Dan Krueger wrote:



We won't know until Monday. Tuesday if he is off for MLK day.

Dan



Don't you have a house somewhere that needs haunting...Krueger?

And that is supposed to be...funny?

Try again Don. Try harder this time.

JimH wrote:

"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
ink.net...

wrote:


JimH wrote:


"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
rthlink.net...


wrote:


JimH wrote:



.................inconsistent.

I was *officially* reprimanded by some folks here for posting a non
political article about a current event. Everyone participating in
the
discussion offered reasonable comments and there were not flames. OK.
Fair
enough. This is a boating NG.

I continue to read numerous posts/threads about cameras, photography,
dogs,
pigs, etc. (non boating). However, I read no reprimands about those
posts.

A bit confusing. Very inconsistent.

Could someone please explain what the new and improved *rules* of this
NG
are?


How about *do unto others as you would have them do unto you*?
One of your problems, Jim, is that you preach to the choir, then don't
heed your own advice.


How about "practice what you preach", Kevin? Notice the clever use of
those fancy quotation marks?


I was thinking the exact same thing Dan. Kevin has flamed me several
times
today.

"Do unto others........" How funny.


Here we go again, Jim is doing his damnest to flame me. It starts with
him calling me kevin, then goes on from there. Next he'll be lying
about others, etc.



"Others" choose to post their real name or a screen name. People respond
to them, at times, by the name they use. You chose *Kevin Noble* and, if
I have to do it for the third time, I can post a copy of that.

I know, you are "borrowing" someone's name, right? Doesn't that seem
really, really stupid by now, Kevin?

Dan



I don't know how I can "flame" someone by using the name he chose to use in
an email address.

Regardless, I shall call him Bassy from now on. Besides, except for a
couple of posts over the past few days he has been trying to behave.


I'll try to follow your lead despite how bizarre his explanation is for
"borrowing" someone's name. I think we all know the real story.

Dan

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:55:20 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

I'll try to follow your lead despite how bizarre his explanation is for
"borrowing" someone's name. I think we all know the real story.

Dan, if you have nothing to say, it's probably inappropriate to say it
here.

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:55:20 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


I'll try to follow your lead despite how bizarre his explanation is for
"borrowing" someone's name. I think we all know the real story.


Dan, if you have nothing to say, it's probably inappropriate to say it
here.


Care to elaborate, Wayne?

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:23:17 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:55:20 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


I'll try to follow your lead despite how bizarre his explanation is for
"borrowing" someone's name. I think we all know the real story.


Dan, if you have nothing to say, it's probably inappropriate to say it
here.


Care to elaborate, Wayne?

Dan, we're mostly just trying to knock off the antagonistic and acerbic
posting of the past. Baiting bassie isn't conducive to a harmonious group.
--
John H

******Have a spectacular day!******

JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:23:17 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:55:20 GMT, Dan Krueger
wrote:


I'll try to follow your lead despite how bizarre his explanation is for
"borrowing" someone's name. I think we all know the real story.

Dan, if you have nothing to say, it's probably inappropriate to say it
here.

Care to elaborate, Wayne?

Dan, we're mostly just trying to knock off the antagonistic and acerbic
posting of the past. Baiting bassie isn't conducive to a harmonious group.
--
John H

******Have a spectacular day!******
I am hoping Bassy ignores the bait. He is smart enough to know when he
is being trolled.

--
Reggie
************************************************** *********************
If you would like to make rec.boats an enjoyable place to discuss
boating, please do not respond to the political and inflammatory
off- topic posts and flames.
************************************************** *********************