Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
That's what I remember, though this one makes me wonder a bit: " Anyone fishing from a sandbar or other land mass that is accessible by boat, or by swimming through water deeper than (3) feet." Wouldn't that include most of the Florida shoreline, if literally applied? You know, like surfcasting from the beach? There were almost always "fish police" at my two favorite Florida boat ramps, busy looking into everyone's coolers as soon as they pulled their boats out of the water. Harry, What are the laws up your way about 'fish police' and they right to inspect? Can they simply board your boat or check your property cuz they can? I've wondered that down here in Florida and altho we do not trailer our boat, I'm curious. On the water I've been informed I have to allow the Coast Guard aboard, but where do my rights and my property begin and end? You can deny an officer to search your vehicle on the road, but what about on the water? In another thread someone mentioned "If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" but at what point do you say enough is enough? |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 2 Jan 2006 08:12:09 -0800, " wrote: Gene Kearns wrote: (Keywords: ; Expiry: ; Reply: ) On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 03:53:17 GMT in rec.boats, NOYB penned the following thoughts: wrote in message roups.com... I do know that we do not need a license to fish from a dock in salt water. That's only true if you're a resident of Florida...or if the pier that you're fishing from has a blanket license that covers everybody fishing from it. Non-residents need a license anytime they're fishing. Are you a Florida resident? Untrue. You don't need a sal****er license in FL if you are a citizen fishing from a structure fixed to land. http://taxcol.martin.fl.us/fishing.asp I think all states on the Atlantic Coast now require sal****er licenses.... excepting two or three. I don't think DE has one, not sure about NJ, and NC will have one in 2007. Anybody know if I missed one? The goal is for all of the states to have licensing... We have to buy Federal licenses, now, for HMS..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/ Homepage* http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Agent Version 3.2 Build 806 Yes, I am a real Florida resident (5th generation) and not a transplant. Furhtermore, "ignorance of the law is no excuse" is nonsense. For example, if you missed an arcane part of the tax code that hardly anybody knew and you ended up losing your house you'd be justifiably ****ed. Laws are meant to be applied intelligently, not blindly as absolutes rarely make sense. I have no problem with the law, it is the absolute enforcement of such when enforcement does more harm than good that I dislike. I would hope the wildlife officer would use discretion when enforcing the law but my experience with the Fl Marine Patrol gives me little hope for that. My experience says that it is best to hide ALL activities from law enforcement people lest they find some excuse to cite you. I can get the pertinent fishing regulation booklet into my shirt pocket. Can you do the same with the tax code? For each species of fish there are dates and sizes. What is arcane about the legal dates and sizes for redfish in Florida? For example: Red Drum (Redfish) Not less than 18" nor more than 27" One per person per day That's really not difficult to comprehend, and the whole regulation would probably fit in your back pocket. The basic recreational sal****er regulations take up two pages. He http://myfwc.com/marine/Regulations/..._JULY_2005.pdf Now you'll never have the worry again. Your experience with law enforcement is different from mine. If DNR wants to see what's in my cooler, they're more than welcome. I *like* them keeping folks honest. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes The fishing code in california is more complex than the tax codes! We have protected fish, that the F&G wardens can not tell from the very similar legal fish, we can fish for rockcod in less than 120' of water, that is contiguous to dry land, but if the water depth goes to more than 120' then the bottom comes up, that is off limits. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DNR may not look into my cooler without cause. Once at a State park,
the park police saw a beer bottle on a nearby table and gave a friend of mine a ticket for this even though it was not his. Then, they proceeded to search all coolers nearby, including mine. Of course, I walked up while they were doing so and went ballistic, snatched my cooler from them, asked em if they had a warrant, etc (I had no alchohol). We all got tickets and went to court in Wakulla. The judge basically told DNR they were at fault and they dropped all charges. Yes, I really am a 5th gen Fl native who does not fish. I have watched people on the beach fishing who catch something that they couldnt identify and throw it back for that reason to avoid being caught with something possibly illegal. maybe that makes sense. I have had bad experiences with the Marine Patrol on two occasions and I no longer expect them to act with any intelligence. In fact, I think my life is in danger whenever they are near (based on my experiences). If you have done nothing wrong, it is best to hide anyway. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry:
Not being a fisherman, I cannot discuss how they treat fishermen. My bad experiences with them were over other aspects of boating and were not only unprofessional of them but genuinely life threatening. As far as joining a militia, nah, I dont even own a gun, ok, I own an old 22 that I have not fired in years. Militia types strike me as nut cases and I do believe there is a need for the laws we are discussing. I am simply arguing for sensible enforcement, not enforcement for the sake of enforcement. I apologize to NYOB, I over reacted. |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... I do know that we do not need a license to fish from a dock in salt water. That's only true if you're a resident of Florida...or if the pier that you're fishing from has a blanket license that covers everybody fishing from it. Non-residents need a license anytime they're fishing. Are you a Florida resident? There is probably an age requirement. 9 years old most likely does not require a license, resident or not. Correct. Age 16. But I got the feeling that dbohara was fishing too. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... (Keywords: ; Expiry: ; Reply: ) On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 03:53:17 GMT in rec.boats, NOYB penned the following thoughts: wrote in message oups.com... I do know that we do not need a license to fish from a dock in salt water. That's only true if you're a resident of Florida...or if the pier that you're fishing from has a blanket license that covers everybody fishing from it. Non-residents need a license anytime they're fishing. Are you a Florida resident? Untrue. Nope, true. Read below. You don't need a sal****er license in FL if you are a citizen fishing from a structure fixed to land. http://taxcol.martin.fl.us/fishing.asp If you're a *citizen of Florida*. A sal****er fishing license is required for: Anyone fishing from a pleasure craft. Each person fishing must have a license on their person. Anyone fishing from a sandbar or other land mass that is accessible by boat, or by swimming through water deeper than (3) feet. Anyone diving who takes, attempts to take, or possess any marine fish. ALL NON-RESIDENTS FISHING IN SALWATER (EXCLUDING THOSE NON-RESIDENTS FISHING FROM A LICENSED PIER). Kids under 16 don't need a license, however. That's what I remember, though this one makes me wonder a bit: " Anyone fishing from a sandbar or other land mass that is accessible by boat, or by swimming through water deeper than (3) feet." Wouldn't that include most of the Florida shoreline, if literally applied? You know, like surfcasting from the beach? Fishing from the beach is OK. If you have to take a boat or swim through water more than 3 feet deep to get to a sandbar, then you need a license to fish from that sandbar. There were almost always "fish police" at my two favorite Florida boat ramps, busy looking into everyone's coolers as soon as they pulled their boats out of the water. I'm glad the fishcops/grouper troopers are out there protecting our fisheries. |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DownTime" wrote in message .. . Harry Krause wrote: That's what I remember, though this one makes me wonder a bit: " Anyone fishing from a sandbar or other land mass that is accessible by boat, or by swimming through water deeper than (3) feet." Wouldn't that include most of the Florida shoreline, if literally applied? You know, like surfcasting from the beach? There were almost always "fish police" at my two favorite Florida boat ramps, busy looking into everyone's coolers as soon as they pulled their boats out of the water. Harry, What are the laws up your way about 'fish police' and they right to inspect? Can they simply board your boat or check your property cuz they can? FWC can do just about anything they want. There are a few 4th Amendment exceptions about checking living quarters on your boat if it is so equipped...but coolers, fishboxes, etc. are fair game. I've wondered that down here in Florida and altho we do not trailer our boat, I'm curious. On the water I've been informed I have to allow the Coast Guard aboard, but where do my rights and my property begin and end? You have very few rights on the water when the CG decides to search your boat. You can deny an officer to search your vehicle on the road, but what about on the water? Nope. In another thread someone mentioned "If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" but at what point do you say enough is enough? Strip searches by limp-wristed fishcops? |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:16:07 +0000, NOYB wrote:
In another thread someone mentioned "If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" but at what point do you say enough is enough? Strip searches by limp-wristed fishcops? How about if they confiscate your new Grady? Scroll down to read about Dick Kaster. http://home.pacbell.net/rsdotson/gov...tOnTheTake.htm |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:16:07 +0000, NOYB wrote: In another thread someone mentioned "If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" but at what point do you say enough is enough? Strip searches by limp-wristed fishcops? How about if they confiscate your new Grady? Scroll down to read about Dick Kaster. http://home.pacbell.net/rsdotson/gov...tOnTheTake.htm There's simply not enough information there to make an informed comment on this case. Did Mr. Kaster have a prior record of illegally gill netting fish? Was a gill net found on his boat at the time? Did the authorities witness Mr. Kaster using a gill net in the lake? Can you find a link to any of the actual court cases on this for me to read? |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many of my neighbors are small commercial fishermen who were driven out
of business by the so called "Net ban Amendment" that was promulgated by so-called "Sport Fishermen" The amendment to the FL constitution is written so badly that it is very difficult to decide if some nets are legal so that the Marine Patrol simply enforces it against those people they do not like. The situation became so tense here in N. Fl that a few yrs ago the Marine patrol refused to rescue some commercial fishermen on a small boat off Alligator Point. The Marine Patrol says they never heard the distress call although they were less than 10 miles away on the water writing a net ban ticket at the time. Instead, the Coast Guard station at Yankeetown 90 miles away did get it and relayed it to the marine Patrol who refused to act on it for hours. Later, the Marine Patrol sai9d the wearher was too rough for them to search in spite of them having a 60' vessel at Carabelle 15 miles away. Finally, other fishermen decided to search since the Marine Patrol refused but by this time the vessel had sunk killing two. It is widely believed in these parts that the Marine Patrol intentionally allowed these men to die to punish the local fishermen for their opposition to the net ban. Meanwhile, it has been found that it is the so-called "Sport Fishermen" with their mega expensive boats that are depleting grouper stocks Given a choice of having sympathy for a hard working "commercial fisherman" with a plywood boat with a 30 yr old Johnson trying to scrape by vs a spoiled rich transplant driving a $100,000 "fishing" boat, I'll take the plywood boat. Because of the extraordinarily foolish idea of putting the net ban in the Fl constitution, many of us here have protested by voting for the pregnant pig amendment and the bullet train amendment. Of course, you can see where the money is as the bullet train amendment ahs been ignored while we still prosecute poor commercial fishermen and sieze their property so the rich "Sport Fishermen" can enjoy themselves. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crantz wrong again....! | ASA | |||
OT--He was wrong then, and he's about to repeat the mistake | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A Recreational Boating Message | General | |||
A message to the bully from David Train | UK Paddle |