Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: JimH wrote: Krause did it several times today also. *** 2 peas in a pod. *** Calling other posters names again Jim? Shame on you. Jim's back in junior high. C'mon guys. We're all headed back to Jr. High if we resume our previous focus on name calling and personalities. Just aching for it to be "somebody else's fault" doesn't excuse destructive or juveniile behavior. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: JimH wrote: Krause did it several times today also. *** 2 peas in a pod. *** Calling other posters names again Jim? Shame on you. Jim's back in junior high. C'mon guys. We're all headed back to Jr. High if we resume our previous focus on name calling and personalities. Just aching for it to be "somebody else's fault" doesn't excuse destructive or juveniile behavior. I agree. I have not called anyone any names. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:06:52 -0500, " JimH" wrote:
wrote in message roups.com... Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: JimH wrote: Krause did it several times today also. *** 2 peas in a pod. *** Calling other posters names again Jim? Shame on you. Jim's back in junior high. C'mon guys. We're all headed back to Jr. High if we resume our previous focus on name calling and personalities. Just aching for it to be "somebody else's fault" doesn't excuse destructive or juveniile behavior. I agree. I have not called anyone any names. True, but you'd have to admit you're engaging Harry in a provocative manner. Granted, he may have started it with the 'lightweight' implication about your boat, but that's the best time to ignore him. He trolled a bait, you bit, and it went downhill from there. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 08:02:19 -0800, chuckgould.chuck wrote:
C'mon guys. We're all headed back to Jr. High if we resume our previous focus on name calling and personalities. Just aching for it to be "somebody else's fault" doesn't excuse destructive or juveniile behavior. Spoken like an adult. Unfortunately, there aren't many here. ;-( |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thunder,
I have to disagree with you, the group has made substantial improvements, even if there are some minor set backs. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 08:02:19 -0800, chuckgould.chuck wrote: C'mon guys. We're all headed back to Jr. High if we resume our previous focus on name calling and personalities. Just aching for it to be "somebody else's fault" doesn't excuse destructive or juveniile behavior. Spoken like an adult. Unfortunately, there aren't many here. ;-( |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is like night and day compared to a couple of weeks ago
"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message ... Thunder, I have to disagree with you, the group has made substantial improvements, even if there are some minor set backs. "thunder" wrote in message ... On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 08:02:19 -0800, chuckgould.chuck wrote: C'mon guys. We're all headed back to Jr. High if we resume our previous focus on name calling and personalities. Just aching for it to be "somebody else's fault" doesn't excuse destructive or juveniile behavior. Spoken like an adult. Unfortunately, there aren't many here. ;-( |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wow, it's quiet! | ASA |