"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves, just
like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc .
etc.

Did you see Sen. Reid dodging Chris Wallace's direct question about whether
he was briefed on the this issue. Reid never did answer the question asked.
Reid was briefed but, he won't admit it.

Also, when Reid asked about disgorging contributions form Abramoff and
friends Reid said that he, Reid, didn't do anything wrong and wasn't going
to disgorge the contributions.

Reid should be brought up on ethics charges for failing to be honest with
his constituents and colleagues.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit
in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just
like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc
..
etc.

Did you see Sen. Reid dodging Chris Wallace's direct question about
whether
he was briefed on the this issue. Reid never did answer the question
asked.
Reid was briefed but, he won't admit it.

Also, when Reid asked about disgorging contributions form Abramoff and
friends Reid said that he, Reid, didn't do anything wrong and wasn't
going
to disgorge the contributions.

Reid should be brought up on ethics charges for failing to be honest
with
his constituents and colleagues.

I stopped watching the politcal shows for the most part, got tired of
the inane questions, asking questions that were answered in the previous
question (don't they ever listen to the answers) and then the obvious
softball interviews...on both the left and right.

In the mean time, you don't see the liebrals whining about this
information being kept secret

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...1/120002.shtml

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit
in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just
like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc
.
etc.

Did you see Sen. Reid dodging Chris Wallace's direct question about
whether
he was briefed on the this issue. Reid never did answer the question
asked.
Reid was briefed but, he won't admit it.

Also, when Reid asked about disgorging contributions form Abramoff and
friends Reid said that he, Reid, didn't do anything wrong and wasn't
going
to disgorge the contributions.

Reid should be brought up on ethics charges for failing to be honest
with
his constituents and colleagues.

I stopped watching the politcal shows for the most part, got tired of
the inane questions, asking questions that were answered in the previous
question (don't they ever listen to the answers) and then the obvious
softball interviews...on both the left and right.

In the mean time, you don't see the liebrals whining about this
information being kept secret

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...1/120002.shtml

Open your curtains. You'll see that NOBODY likes this type of information
being kept secret.