JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:42:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


JohnH wrote:

He did not.


Ever read the 4th amendment to the Constitution?


On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak wrote:



And he admits violating the law


He did not.



and says he will do it again. It's
interesting to note that the special secret court organized to hear the
probable cause for these wiretaps has only turned down one of them and
that the NSA can proceed with a tap under the current law if they obtain
a warrant within a specified period, 48 hours, I think. So, it would
appear that the only real reason to circumvent due process is to prevent
the court from finding out who they are surveilling.

One of our legislators recently tried to remind him that it's President
bush, not KING bush. If we don't step on this guy's fingers on this one,
he's going to have all those in uniforms chasing those without.

Capt. Jeff


--
John H

**** May your Christmas be Spectacular!****
*****...and your New Year even Better!*****


Is the 4th Amendment where Bush admits violating the law? If not, then of what pertinence is your
question?
--
John H

**** May your Christmas be Spectacular!****
*****...and your New Year even Better!*****

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The 4th amendment is the law violated, on orders of the president.