"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit in that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about this and
kept silent?

We have people who want a law against torture because they assure us it
could be violated in extraordinary circumstance (the a-bomb and
terrorist example) yet when some laws are violated in extraordinary
circumstances they want to criticize. They seem to strive to be
consistently inconsistent.
It would seem more logical to me that those who want a law against
torture, expecting it to be violated in extraordinary circumstance
would have few problems with a violation of another law in a very
similar extraordinary circumstance.

wrote in message
ups.com...
We have people who want a law against torture because they assure us it
could be violated in extraordinary circumstance (the a-bomb and
terrorist example) yet when some laws are violated in extraordinary
circumstances they want to criticize. They seem to strive to be
consistently inconsistent.
It would seem more logical to me that those who want a law against
torture, expecting it to be violated in extraordinary circumstance
would have few problems with a violation of another law in a very
similar extraordinary circumstance.


Perhaps if your president was honest about it, it wouldn't be such an issue.
Actually, he *will* be honest about it, as soon as Uncle Karl tells him to.

I am so envious of Karl Rove being called "Evil Genius". I thought
that people had titles like that only in Power Puff Girl episodes. I
am going to demand that my employees make me a sign for my office door
saying "Evil Genius" and address me that way.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about this
and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc
.. etc.

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves, just
like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc .
etc.

Did you see Sen. Reid dodging Chris Wallace's direct question about whether
he was briefed on the this issue. Reid never did answer the question asked.
Reid was briefed but, he won't admit it.

Also, when Reid asked about disgorging contributions form Abramoff and
friends Reid said that he, Reid, didn't do anything wrong and wasn't going
to disgorge the contributions.

Reid should be brought up on ethics charges for failing to be honest with
his constituents and colleagues.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit
in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just
like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc
..
etc.

Did you see Sen. Reid dodging Chris Wallace's direct question about
whether
he was briefed on the this issue. Reid never did answer the question
asked.
Reid was briefed but, he won't admit it.

Also, when Reid asked about disgorging contributions form Abramoff and
friends Reid said that he, Reid, didn't do anything wrong and wasn't
going
to disgorge the contributions.

Reid should be brought up on ethics charges for failing to be honest
with
his constituents and colleagues.

I stopped watching the politcal shows for the most part, got tired of
the inane questions, asking questions that were answered in the previous
question (don't they ever listen to the answers) and then the obvious
softball interviews...on both the left and right.

In the mean time, you don't see the liebrals whining about this
information being kept secret

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...1/120002.shtml

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit
in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just
like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc
.
etc.

Did you see Sen. Reid dodging Chris Wallace's direct question about
whether
he was briefed on the this issue. Reid never did answer the question
asked.
Reid was briefed but, he won't admit it.

Also, when Reid asked about disgorging contributions form Abramoff and
friends Reid said that he, Reid, didn't do anything wrong and wasn't
going
to disgorge the contributions.

Reid should be brought up on ethics charges for failing to be honest
with
his constituents and colleagues.

I stopped watching the politcal shows for the most part, got tired of
the inane questions, asking questions that were answered in the previous
question (don't they ever listen to the answers) and then the obvious
softball interviews...on both the left and right.

In the mean time, you don't see the liebrals whining about this
information being kept secret

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...1/120002.shtml

Open your curtains. You'll see that NOBODY likes this type of information
being kept secret.

On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:05:56 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about this
and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied" etc
. etc.

Perhaps *some* of the *liberals*. Not fair to generalize that to all of them.
--
John H

**** May your Christmas be Spectacular!****
*****...and your New Year even Better!*****

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:05:56 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:54:48 -0800, Tamaroak
wrote:

And he admits violating the law

He did not.

If Pres. Bush violated the law, then the US Congress was complicit
in
that
law breaking. Are we going ot arrest the Congressmen that new about
this
and
kept silent?



This will be the lastest chapter of the liebrals soiling themselves,
just like the past occaasions of the non-leak of plame, and "bush lied"
etc
. etc.

Perhaps *some* of the *liberals*. Not fair to generalize that to all of
them.

Just watch the frenzy over the next few days between the talking heads of
the DNC and the MSM............wouldn't be surprised to see Dean Scream III

--
John H

**** May your Christmas be Spectacular!****
*****...and your New Year even Better!*****