How 'bout it pig pilers
 

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:21:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

And, of
course, they behave as they do whether I'm posting or not, so it really
has little to do with me.

======================================

Not sure I agree with that. At any rate, if you insist on keeping the
ball in play at any cost, perhaps you could cut down the quoted
material to the barest minimum so that I don't accidently run into any
more BS than necessary. Others might appreciate it also.

How 'bout it pig pilers
 

Harry,

Do you find it funny that Skipper would claim to own a gun, and use that
imaginary gun to make him an expert in the field?

What would you think if Skipper made a Sock Puppet, and then posted from the
same IP, asking Skipper if he didn't meet him down at the shooting range?
Would you question his veracity in most posts where he discussed guns? What
is Skipper made up an imaginary "expert" who he used to belittle your gun
knowledge?

That would be pretty low wouldn't it.




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Skipper wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:

Skipper wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:

Skipper wrote:

How's that "safety" on the double-action S&W pistol you imagined?

I'd much prefer to discuss 'get home' power

Why would that interest a boatless cripple in landlocked Derby, Kansas?

LEt's talk about those handguns you imagined you owned.

We've discussed guns in detail. Let's discuss that get home power you
once bragged on.

--
Skipper


Yes, we discussed the guns in enough detail for you to try to b.s. about
the S&W you don't own with the "safety."

Why would a discussion of sal****er boats be of interest to someone stuck
for life in Derby, Kansas?




--
If Jeb runs, let's go to a country with smarter family dictators.

Get Home Power
 

Skipper,
What kind of "Get Home Power" would someone put in a 36' boat?


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:

We've discussed guns in detail. Let's discuss that get home power you
once bragged on.

Yes, we discussed the guns in enough detail...Why would a discussion
of sal****er boats be of interest...?

Well, that's because this is a boating forum and some might find such an
on topic discussion of interest. Suspect we may have more than a few
subscribers who'd like to learn more on the subject.

--
Skipper

How 'bout it pig pilers
 

JohnH,
I try to be very polite when I talk to Harry. I might question his politics
and his stories he uses to validate a point, but I try to be polite. I
wonder why Harry is so upset with me.


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:21:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:15:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

I'm always in favor of good manners and fewer snarky, smarmy, unctuous
posters here.

====================

Me too.

Basically I have kill filed all of the usual suspects except you
Harry, not because I approve of your behavior, but because you
ocassionally contribute something about boating that interests me.

I'm now left with these strange threads, like this one, where you
appear to be talking to yourself at great length. That sort of proves
my point that If you'd give up on the inane discourse with these guys,
the news group would be a whole lot cleaner and might eventually
gravitate back towards boats.

Think about it.


I've not only thought about it, Wayne, I've tried some experiments here
to observe what might rid this newsgroup of the boatless or
"no-boat-discussion" right-wing vermin that infests this place, or at
least get them to control themselves a bit. These jerks infest almost
every discussion and lead it to idiocy, leaving nothing behind. And, of
course, they behave as they do whether I'm posting or not, so it really
has little to do with me.

We've got one guy who today says he finds someone else's posts
"offensive," so what does he do? He gathers the offensive parts together
and reposts them a half dozen times, and when I advise him I'm not
interested, he posts them again, in case I missed them. And he's a
sometime boater.

Well, Harry, what do you think of Wayne's New Year's resolution idea?

I've asked about half a dozen times, but you refuse to answer the
question.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!

How 'bout it pig pilers
 

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:21:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

And, of
course, they behave as they do whether I'm posting or not, so it really
has little to do with me.

======================================

Not sure I agree with that. At any rate, if you insist on keeping the
ball in play at any cost, perhaps you could cut down the quoted
material to the barest minimum so that I don't accidently run into any
more BS than necessary. Others might appreciate it also.


So why do you tolerate Krause and not others who perhaps contribute more to
this NG than he does.?

How 'bout it pig pilers
 

JimH,
Wayne, like all of us, has his biases. He obviously likes Harry or his
politics, so he gives Harry a ride. I am surprised that he doesn't find
Harry's political trolls repetitive, but Wayne is using filters the way they
are supposed to be used. He filters out posts he doesn't want to read, and
he very rarely mentions those he has filtered. He never discusses or use
his "filters" as an avenue to insult others.



" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:21:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

And, of
course, they behave as they do whether I'm posting or not, so it really
has little to do with me.

======================================

Not sure I agree with that. At any rate, if you insist on keeping the
ball in play at any cost, perhaps you could cut down the quoted
material to the barest minimum so that I don't accidently run into any
more BS than necessary. Others might appreciate it also.


So why do you tolerate Krause and not others who perhaps contribute more
to this NG than he does.?

How 'bout it pig pilers
 

I realize that Smithers.

My question was rhetorical in nature as I am sure you understood.. ;-)


"Smithers" Yes, Smithers is not my real name. wrote in message
. ..
JimH,
Wayne, like all of us, has his biases. He obviously likes Harry or his
politics, so he gives Harry a ride. I am surprised that he doesn't find
Harry's political trolls repetitive, but Wayne is using filters the way
they
are supposed to be used. He filters out posts he doesn't want to read,
and
he very rarely mentions those he has filtered. He never discusses or use
his "filters" as an avenue to insult others.



" JimH" wrote in message
...

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:21:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

And, of
course, they behave as they do whether I'm posting or not, so it really
has little to do with me.

======================================

Not sure I agree with that. At any rate, if you insist on keeping the
ball in play at any cost, perhaps you could cut down the quoted
material to the barest minimum so that I don't accidently run into any
more BS than necessary. Others might appreciate it also.


So why do you tolerate Krause and not others who perhaps contribute more
to this NG than he does.?

Get Home Power
 

Smithers wrote:

Skipper,
What kind of "Get Home Power" would someone put in a 36' boat?

Believe I'd opt for the traditional auxiliary in a sailboat. Harry
claimed to have a dedicated wing engine in that fab 36-footer, not a
mechanical hookup to the generator. I simply didn't believe Harry's
story. Further, It's my thought that there are better options than going
wing engine for the type of boat Harry claimed to own...and
particularly, for the type of boating he claims to do.

--
Skipper

Get Home Power
 

Harry,
What do you think about Skippers idea of having a mechanical hookup to the
generator? I am sure when you were making up the story about a dedicated
wing engine you had a review of the benefits of either system. What did
they say?


"Skipper" wrote in message
...
Smithers wrote:

Skipper,
What kind of "Get Home Power" would someone put in a 36' boat?

Believe I'd opt for the traditional auxiliary in a sailboat. Harry
claimed to have a dedicated wing engine in that fab 36-footer, not a
mechanical hookup to the generator. I simply didn't believe Harry's
story. Further, It's my thought that there are better options than going
wing engine for the type of boat Harry claimed to own...and
particularly, for the type of boating he claims to do.

--
Skipper

Get Home Power
 

Harry,
I know you don't want to publish pictures of your "Lobster Boat", how about
just a picture of your "Get Home Power"?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Skipper wrote:
Smithers wrote:

Skipper,
What kind of "Get Home Power" would someone put in a 36' boat?

Believe I'd opt for the traditional auxiliary in a sailboat. Harry
claimed to have a dedicated wing engine in that fab 36-footer, not a
mechanical hookup to the generator. I simply didn't believe Harry's
story. Further, It's my thought that there are better options than going
wing engine for the type of boat Harry claimed to own...and
particularly, for the type of boating he claims to do. --
Skipper


The very concept of a landlocker like you pretending to have any actual
expertise whatsoever about sal****er boats transcends absurd.

It's your "thought there are better systems..." coming from an old cripple
like you who lives in Derby, Kansas, and knows next to nothing about boats
that make anyone who does know about boats giggle at your ignorance.

Encountered any sudden-onset Tostitos lately with 30-foot waves crashing
against the bow of your Bayliner with the strap-on tanks? My guess is the
only Mexican waters you see are from the cooler at your local Taco Bell.

Oh...no one knowledgeable about S&W history seems to have ever encountered
a double-action .357 with a safety as you described. Horace Smith and
Daniel Wesson are rolling in their graves with that b.s. tale.

Where'd you buy that S&W? Done Mexico way?



--
Support our Troops: Bring Them Home Now!