Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:04:26 -0600, "Dan J.S." wrote: It is time for the Subaru story again? You know - the one where a guy stole a Honda 125, shot out of an intersection and my wife broadsided him - couldn't avoid him? And where the owner of the Honda came to get his motorcycle, picked it up, started it and drove it home while the Subaru has to be towed and subsequently was totaled with $9,000 worth of damage? Probably what saved her life. If she was driving a Ford, there would be a good chance she would come out with something worse than a bruising. Saved what life? She hit in just under 35 mph. It was a Honda 125 which weighed, what , about 300 lbs? Plus, do you believe another car would have less damage? The damage was $2000 more than the price of the car. Yes, I do believe that. The thing folded up like an accordion. The 125 had a small dent in the fuel tank and was driven away. Subaru's are crap cars, always have been, always will be. All the nonsense about "crumple zones", etc., hides the fact that they are built out of recycled tin cans. Subarus are extremely solid. No they aren't. I made the mistake once of leaning back on the hood of a 2002 Forester and put a nice dent in it. Can't do that to any of the cars I own. Looks what people race at rallies where you drive these, un modified in many cases, 80 MPH on dirt roads... Show me one American car that could take that abuse... Any of them. Haha! I am glad GM and Ford marketing propaganda is working on you. Haha... |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
I have owned several Fords and the worst thing that ever happened was when
the computer died on one vehicle. Had to get it towed, dianosed, and fixed for a total of $200. "FREDO" wrote in message .. . I had a 94 F-150 XLT Lariat best pulling truck I ever had in 4X4 (locking front and rear differentials). But man it was not reliable! In 36,000 miles and 1 year it had the following repairs: brake pads and rotors replaced 4 times (rotors kept warping) fan clutch replaced 2 times HVAC repaired 3 times they finally found the orifice was missing from the system, the darn thing would only blow cold air while traveling on the interstate, any time you went to in town traffic mode it blew hot air. Radio quit 2 times. So I traded it on my 96 Subaru Outback and so far it has never been in for any repairs. My 00 GMC has had the transfer case replaced, the steering gearbox replaced and the P/S pump replaced (all under warranty) since then it has been a truly reliable vehicle. I wish you well with your Ford quality issues. "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message news To those that read my "trip to hell" back in November where I spend 5 days in a hotel room in Georgia while they fixed my super duty Ford 350 ..... I just got back from my final trip to Florida - picked up the Scout (another story) and started the trip back to MA. Got to Norfork and visited Eisboch Jr. and his very pregnant wife, then headed north towing the Scout. Got as far as Fredricksburg, VA and the new, heavy duty diesel Ford 350 died again. After all kinds of debates and decisions, I ended up hiring the tow company to transport the dead Ford, with a 20' Scout in tow, all the way from VA to MA. We dropped off the boat in my driveway, then continued to Plymouth, MA and dropped off the dead Ford in the dealer's lot. Gonna be a bit of excitement down there on Monday when they open. Eisboch (back from the last trip to hell) FORD - Found On Road Dead I can't wait for Toyota to start making something comparable to the 350 - and then it's bye bye American brands. |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:56:08 GMT, "FREDO" wrote: I had a 94 F-150 XLT Lariat best pulling truck I ever had in 4X4 (locking front and rear differentials). But man it was not reliable! In 36,000 miles and 1 year it had the following repairs: brake pads and rotors replaced 4 times (rotors kept warping) fan clutch replaced 2 times HVAC repaired 3 times they finally found the orifice was missing from the system, the darn thing would only blow cold air while traveling on the interstate, any time you went to in town traffic mode it blew hot air. Radio quit 2 times. Horse feathers. I don't believe it. So I traded it on my 96 Subaru Outback and so far it has never been in for any repairs. My 00 GMC has had the transfer case replaced, the steering gearbox replaced and the P/S pump replaced (all under warranty) since then it has been a truly reliable vehicle. I wish you well with your Ford quality issues. I have a 2000 F-250 Super Duty 4X4, 7.3 liter diesel and the only thing I've had go wrong with it was a stuck caliber when I first bought it. 100,000 miles and it's just getting broken in. 17 mpg around town and 22/23 on the highway. Best big pickup I've ever owned. Which have all been Fords. All of which were traded with no problems at all during the time I owned them. When I was actually in the market for a diesel truck, I almost bought a Ford with the six liter engine, but I kept encountering tales of minor and serious horror stories about the motor. So I started reading up on the GM diesel pickup, and lo and behold, the same sorts of horror stories. That's the major reason I decided not to buy either. Spending $40,000+ on a truck that wasn't going to behave was not my idea of a smart thing to do. Since then, the urge for a diesel truck has passed. A close friend bought a new full-size Chevy truck last year, a 4x4, and it doesn't impress me all that much. I haven't looked at the new Ford full-size gas engine truckz in a while. I like pickup trucks, but I like a little fit and finish on them. The latest Ford and GM offerings just don't do much for me in that area. Go take a look at the Ford's in their King Ranch version. I call them Maximum Cow. Damn, they look and feel good. |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
The problem with the paint was universal with all American Cars built in the
80's. I think it had to so with a reformulated paint with the ClearCoat. The problem was bad enough that all manu.'s offered an undisclosed 5 yr warranty on the paint. I had both of my cars repainted for free when they started to flake after 3 - 4 yrs. "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:53:31 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Ford uses the worst paint available on the market in terms of durability and thinness of coat. Get with the times dude. :) They solved that problem years ago. |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
... Actually, I had a ride in a Tundra the other day and was pleasantly surprised - it seemed like a nice truck. Not nice enough to replace my F-250 Super Duty 7.3 liter diesel 4x4, but it was still nice. I'm sure that if and when Toyota chooses to address that market niche, they'll do so very nicely. |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
"Skipper" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: Consumer Reports is a joke. They just do cursory evaluations of the vehicles. They're even worse with their boat reports. Many of the reports stoop to the misleading superficial levels of a Chucky boat review. -- Skipper When did CR begin evaluating boats? There is nothing to that effect in their index of reviews. Are you drunk again? |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
Doug,
CR is a well intentioned group of individuals who don't seem to have a clue. The don't review boats, but they seem to miss the mark on all other products. It seemed that they would always pick the product with the worst quality. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "Skipper" wrote in message ... Bert Robbins wrote: Consumer Reports is a joke. They just do cursory evaluations of the vehicles. They're even worse with their boat reports. Many of the reports stoop to the misleading superficial levels of a Chucky boat review. -- Skipper When did CR begin evaluating boats? There is nothing to that effect in their index of reviews. Are you drunk again? |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again :Subaru
"FREDO" wrote in message
.. . Subaru's are designed to crumple in order to absorb impact. Also, they are designed to push the engine and transmission downward under the passenger compartment in a frontal crash via a "Pitching Stopper" to lessen the possibility of the engine coming into the passenger compartment. They consistently receive 5 star ratings from the U.S. government in crash testing. Saw that happen back in the 1970s with an Eldorado. The engine vacated its compartment completely, and crushed & burned the driver. Not pretty. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Dan J.S." wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message news To those that read my "trip to hell" back in November where I spend 5 days in a hotel room in Georgia while they fixed my super duty Ford 350 ..... I just got back from my final trip to Florida - picked up the Scout (another story) and started the trip back to MA. Got to Norfork and visited Eisboch Jr. and his very pregnant wife, then headed north towing the Scout. Got as far as Fredricksburg, VA and the new, heavy duty diesel Ford 350 died again. After all kinds of debates and decisions, I ended up hiring the tow company to transport the dead Ford, with a 20' Scout in tow, all the way from VA to MA. We dropped off the boat in my driveway, then continued to Plymouth, MA and dropped off the dead Ford in the dealer's lot. Gonna be a bit of excitement down there on Monday when they open. Eisboch (back from the last trip to hell) FORD - Found On Road Dead FORD = First On Race Day It's silly to point to situations where cars are maintained by expert mechanics and constantly tweaked. |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
déjà vu all over again
"Lord Reginald Smithers" The fastest and most accurate Gun in the World
wrote in message ... Doug, CR is a well intentioned group of individuals who don't seem to have a clue. The don't review boats, but they seem to miss the mark on all other products. It seemed that they would always pick the product with the worst quality. For some products, they really are off base. Stereo equipment's a good example. When I was in that biz back in the late 70s & 1980s, they'd always recommend Japanese speakers, which sounded horrible. And, Sanyo car stereos, which were an absolute joke at the time. With cars, though, I think they're between a rock and a hard place. Some people like to slam their reliability surveys because they primarily cover very young cars. But, how long does the average buyer keep a car? Is it that easy to find a large sample of people whose cars have reached 100,000 miles? For things like appliances, I don't think it's possible to do any better. But, the magazine *does* educate some readers about features they might not have otherwise considered. This is important because considering the low quality of most retail staff, you might never hear about these features in the stores. It ain't perfect, but I have yet to hear anyone come up with constructive suggestions. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|