On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:06:06 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JimH wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
"tacoexpress" wrote in message
oups.com...
I'm curious then where you adopted the term "liberal media bias" or is
that simply your own perception?

It's the truth... the media has taken upon a lot of Marxist views when
contrasting with today's events.


e.g.
=================================================
http://right-wing-b.s./bmrls

How the ACLU and other secularist Grinches have almost stolen Christmas -


A crock of absolute, complete, simple-minded right-wing crap.

You read it, Harry? Didn't think so. More mindless spewing, right?

--
John H

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Then why do you keep snipping it?

I'm performing a public service.

The reality is, Christmas itself is a canard, a holiday
that only by convention is celebrated on the 25th of December. The date
itself has nothing to do with the man now called Jesus. What you are
celebrating is a holiday created from whole cloth by Constantine the
Great in the fourth century. He picked the same date as an existing
pagan festival.

Jesus, a pious Jewish man, probably would have disdained the holiday
named for him via a name that was not his.

Probably not Harry.

Really, and what you base that on? Your extensive knowledge of first
century pious Jews?


A more reliable source than you base your BS on.

Merry Christmas Harry.

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:55:42 -0500, John H. wrote:


http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2447

This line seems to say a lot:

A full 92% of responding journalists said the quality of economic policy
coverage on broadcast TV networks was only "fair" or "poor," with just 6%
saying it was "good" and not a single respondent saying it was
"excellent."

And that's with journalists rating journalists! Thirty-five percent
thought the major daily newspapers were 'fair' or 'poor'. And that's
journalists rating journalists!

Of the minority who do not identify with the center, most have left
leanings concerning social issues and right leanings concerning economic
ones. (But go look at the numbers.)

And all of the above are indications of an incompetent media, not a
"liberal" biased one.

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:22:47 -0500, thunder wrote:

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:55:42 -0500, John H. wrote:


http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2447

This line seems to say a lot:

A full 92% of responding journalists said the quality of economic policy
coverage on broadcast TV networks was only "fair" or "poor," with just 6%
saying it was "good" and not a single respondent saying it was
"excellent."

And that's with journalists rating journalists! Thirty-five percent
thought the major daily newspapers were 'fair' or 'poor'. And that's
journalists rating journalists!

Of the minority who do not identify with the center, most have left
leanings concerning social issues and right leanings concerning economic
ones. (But go look at the numbers.)

And all of the above are indications of an incompetent media, not a
"liberal" biased one.

Could they be incompetent *because* of their liberal bias? Fox doesn't seem 'liberally biased', yet
it reports news not heard on the 'major' networks.

--
John H

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day.

Harry Krause is the kind of person who defended Stalin. The same type
of person defended the mass firing squads of Che Guevara. His type
defended the Khmer Rouge as being simply "overenthusiastic
revolutionaries". Now he defends Saddam and the PRC. He has too
because the blood on his hands simply will not come off.

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:13:56 -0800, dbohara wrote:

His type defended
the Khmer Rouge as being simply "overenthusiastic revolutionaries".

But your type didn't? I hadn't realized you weren't American.

http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/hermansept97.htm

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Anybody else notice how the corrupt liberal media has failed to report
on the massacre going on in China right now? Of course they wont
report it because this would tarnish the image of the system they love
so much.
I checked with a source, in Asia, and found that only two were killed and
several wounded. It seems that the villagers attacked the police and
some
resisted arrest while others were prepared to "fire bomb" the police.

Perhaps the killings were justified????



And you argued the same justification for Kent State? They were throwing
rocks. Thats dangerous.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:36:16 -0500, Jim Carter wrote:


Harry, I purposely quoted the news clip from "Radio Free Asia" because
it
is very right wing. This is the station that is broadcasting reports
for
the CIA. It is also funded by the CIA. This was to counter the
thread
started that was saying reports are not taken seriously by the "liberal"
media.

Harry, check it out please.......

It's too early to say with any certainty the situation in China, but I
have always been surprised at the violence in some Asian protests. IIRC,
several demonstrations in S. Korea and Japan, the use of fire bombs were
common. There was a protest over an airport, several years back, that
had
fire bombs used against the police almost daily.

Kent State.



So agree the troops were also justified at Kent State?

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Anybody else notice how the corrupt liberal media has failed to report
on the massacre going on in China right now? Of course they wont
report it because this would tarnish the image of the system they love
so much.
I checked with a source, in Asia, and found that only two were killed
and
several wounded. It seems that the villagers attacked the police and
some
resisted arrest while others were prepared to "fire bomb" the police.

Perhaps the killings were justified????



And you argued the same justification for Kent State? They were throwing
rocks. Thats dangerous.
I argued for the same justification for Kent State???? When did I do
that???

Jim C.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No, dummy, I'm not. I'm suggesting that the government in this country
is sometimes no different than the government in the PRC. It kills
people when there is no reason for it.
Harry, you need to do some research into this incident. I do believe the
shootings were justified. The police were shooting in self defense against
people tossing fire bombs at them and attacking with machete type weapons.
This is easily verified with the reports by the independent news agencies
there, including your own government's agency who reported it for Radio Free
Asia.

Jim C.