JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:34:40 +1100, K Smith wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:52:29 +1100, K Smith wrote:



John H. wrote:


On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:46:13 -0600, Hoodoo wrote:




I'm top-posting here to leave the evidential data below in reverse
chronological order.

In response to KKKrause's denigrating commentary of,
-------
"Gotta love the way righties jump to conclusions, though. Simple
little minds, no capabilities of abstract thinking. D'oh. A trait
shared by so many of his extremist buddies here.",
-------
I find exquisite pleasure in revealing verifiable evidence that
herr e. KKKrause HAS BEEN CAUGHT LYING... AGAIN!



Although what you say may be true, some of us are trying to change the tone of the rec.boats group.
We are trying to be more understanding of the traits of others and not 'pile on' when something
untoward happens. So, don't be surprised if you don't get a huge reaction from your announcement.


--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!

Give it up John; Krause is just a lying turd & that's an insult to turds.

He & his mates including the spam queen chuckles are just dishonest
liars & you trying to befriend them endlessly is demeaning to you &
mankind in general.


Bullies do it because in their view it works & you kowtowing just helps
them, come on be a man.

K


Karen, do you really think I'm kowtowing to him? Damn, he thinks I'm treating him like poop. I'm
trying hard to be other than smarmy, swarmy, snarky, unctuous, or pusilanimous. It's hard not being
at least *one* of them.

John I accept your motives a good but it's all been tried too many times
now, you correctly try to lift the tone then the idiots just take
advantage of more on topic stuff to attack with their political or other
crap. Well of course Tom will still be here just "believing" Ficht E-Tec
works:-) (sorry I giggle just thinking about it)


I've been trying to get Harold to agree to a New Year's resolution which would put an end to the
name-calling, piling-on, and all those behaviors listed above (which are most despicable, I
understand) although I'm not sure what some of them are.

Again John I have to tell you you've been taken in by a trickster he
doesn't "own" a boat!!! never has done not one of his lies about boat
ownerships are true. He goes to extraordinary lengths to convince people
he is a boater when he just isn't. Yes Yes I know you "believe" because
he has access to a corp or charter boat he does indeed "own" it; he does
not. I suspect given his priors that the latest lie is a cover for more
defrauding of union funds so the staff of the people entrusted with hard
workers' money can squander it.


He refuses to partake. I don't know why, other than it would reduce the number of his posts by about
97%.
--

I know why!!! he's not a boater his actual paid job is to spruik for the
unions!!! have you not read his history?? Again; he actually works for a
union always has done, no boat, no education, no experience in any real
job, no "Dr Dr" wife, no brought up in a boat dealership, no nothing
he's just another piece of union grub, the same grubs that have all on
their own destroyed the US manufacturing base.

Anyway you hold your views & I hold mine, good luck with your attempt to
help the NG but ......................


K


My gosh. I thought my reputation was better than that. Honestly, Karen, you credit me with a
gullibility I don't own.

Unless he sold his Parker, he does own one boat that I'm sure of. I've met and talked to the man who
sold it to him, and talked to the marina where he stored it (same marina that I use). He was paying
for trailer storage, but was slipping the hands a few bucks to leave his boat 'stored' on a wash
rack. This, of course, inconvenienced those of us who *used* the wash rack for its intended purpose.
Apparently some complaints were made to management, and his boat got put back in the trailer park.
Shortly thereafter, he moved it to a much cheaper trailer park.


Absolutely none of which says he "owns" a boat. He is a lackey for the
the union fund & this is why I suggest it's another ripoff of real
workers' money.


It hurts my soul to see you say I've been taken in by a trickster.

I'm even asking him what information he wants about me!

Well be careful those before you who have allowed him even seemingly
innocent info have regretted it muchly, I hope you don't.

K


--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:13:17 +1100, K Smith wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:34:40 +1100, K Smith wrote:
K


My gosh. I thought my reputation was better than that. Honestly, Karen, you credit me with a
gullibility I don't own.

Unless he sold his Parker, he does own one boat that I'm sure of. I've met and talked to the man who
sold it to him, and talked to the marina where he stored it (same marina that I use). He was paying
for trailer storage, but was slipping the hands a few bucks to leave his boat 'stored' on a wash
rack. This, of course, inconvenienced those of us who *used* the wash rack for its intended purpose.
Apparently some complaints were made to management, and his boat got put back in the trailer park.
Shortly thereafter, he moved it to a much cheaper trailer park.


Absolutely none of which says he "owns" a boat. He is a lackey for the
the union fund & this is why I suggest it's another ripoff of real
workers' money.


It hurts my soul to see you say I've been taken in by a trickster.

I'm even asking him what information he wants about me!

Well be careful those before you who have allowed him even seemingly
innocent info have regretted it muchly, I hope you don't.

K

Well, actually, that's kind of an 'in' thing, asking Harry what personal information he wants.
--
John Herring
May your Christmas be Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!