"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

If she were elected, the day after she took office a massive withdrawal
of troops would begin.

Are you saying that she's lying when she says that Murtha's plan for
immediate withdrawal is wrong? She stated that we can't leave until the
country is stabilized, so it doesn't become a lawless training ground for
terrorists.



This is why it is useless to engage "your type" in discussion. If Hillary
were to be elected, she would not take office for more than three years.
It is doubtful she will have the same views on Iraq three years hence as
she does now.

Let's assume that the situation in Iraq hasn't improved...or has actually
worsened. Hillary's reason for not leaving immediately is that Iraq is not
stable enough. If it's less stable in three years, why would she change her
mind? If anything, a less stable Iraq should strengthen her resolve to stay
there until the job is done.


This is a silly hypothetical anyhow. Hillary has as much chance at being
President as you do. In fact, she probably has less chance since she has
far more enemies.