Firefox
 

I just downloaded and installed the just released, updated Firefox and
Thunderbird programs to this (new) laptop. I noticed that Firefox still has
a minor, but annoying habit of defaulting to a small text size everytime I
open it. I keep setting the text size to a larger font but it keeps
defaulting back to the smaller size whenever I close, then reopen the
browser.

Any of you Firefox users know how to make the text size setting permanent?

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.

Firefox
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
I just downloaded and installed the just released, updated Firefox and
Thunderbird programs to this (new) laptop. I noticed that Firefox still
has a minor, but annoying habit of defaulting to a small text size
everytime I open it. I keep setting the text size to a larger font but it
keeps defaulting back to the smaller size whenever I close, then reopen the
browser.

Any of you Firefox users know how to make the text size setting permanent?

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.




I download v 1.5 yesterday and have no problems with the text size.

Try posting your problem to the forums at pcpitstop.com and I am sure you
will get prompt and accurate advice.

You can also try some of the firefox and mozilla forums on the net.

Firefox
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

I just downloaded and installed the just released, updated Firefox and
Thunderbird programs to this (new) laptop. I noticed that Firefox
still has a minor, but annoying habit of defaulting to a small text
size everytime I open it. I keep setting the text size to a larger
font but it keeps defaulting back to the smaller size whenever I
close, then reopen the browser.

Any of you Firefox users know how to make the text size setting
permanent?

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.



Try Tools, Options, Content, Fonts-Colors/Advanced and play around with
the options there. And note the check box for over-riding page fonts.



That worked. Thanks.

Eisboch

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
I just downloaded and installed the just released, updated Firefox and
Thunderbird programs to this (new) laptop. I noticed that Firefox still
has a minor, but annoying habit of defaulting to a small text size
everytime I open it. I keep setting the text size to a larger font but
it keeps defaulting back to the smaller size whenever I close, then
reopen the browser.

Any of you Firefox users know how to make the text size setting
permanent?

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.



Try Tools, Options, Content, Fonts-Colors/Advanced and play around with
the options there. And note the check box for over-riding page fonts.


--


Nice catch Harry.

Firefox
 

Harry Krause wrote:


You want a giggle? A major software vendor has selected me to be a beta
tester for an upcoming *Italian* version of its software. Somewhere I
must have answered a survey question positively when it asked, "Do you
like Italian food?"




Parlate e leggete italiano?

Eisboch

Firefox
 

Harry Krause wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

You want a giggle? A major software vendor has selected me to be a
beta tester for an upcoming *Italian* version of its software.
Somewhere I must have answered a survey question positively when it
asked, "Do you like Italian food?"




Parlate e leggete italiano?

Eisboch


I had four years of Latin in high school, and I like Italian food.
I can read a little Italian, and I can ask for a few necessities.



I did it the easy way. I married an Italian.

Eisboch (also cheats with free translation)

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.

I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program.

Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by
non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and
framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed
that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program.

Later,

Tom

Hi Tom,

I had not used Firefox for a while because I noticed the same problem.
Plugins where often required that were not available. Last evening when I
was playing with the new release I noticed that at least some plugins are
now available. It seems they are slowing filling in the gaps.

Eisboch

Firefox
 

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:20:16 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.

I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program.

Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by
non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and
framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed
that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program.

Later,

Tom

Are you talking about the orientation of the photos? I've noticed that if I try
to put a photo in Yahoo Photos after I've changed the orientation, the change
won't take. I've removed the EXIF data and that seemed to work.
--
John H

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Self-obsessed Hypocrite]

Firefox
 

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:18:00 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:53:27 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:20:16 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.

I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program.

Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by
non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and
framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed
that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program.

Are you talking about the orientation of the photos? I've noticed that if I try
to put a photo in Yahoo Photos after I've changed the orientation, the change
won't take. I've removed the EXIF data and that seemed to work.

No. some browsers, notably Opera, Firefox and that Mac crap, require
embedded color curve and distribution data in the image to properly
display the it. IE doesn't and at one time, Netscape didn't - don't
know if it does now.

EXIF data shouldn't have any effect on orientation - it's just data on
the who, what and where of the technical data on the image.

Later,

Tom

That's what I thought, about the EXIF data. But, if I changed the orientation
(i.e., rotated) a picture, and then tried to put it in a Yahoo Photo album, the
old orientation would return. Only by rotating and then removing the original
EXIF data was I able to get the new orientation to take in Yahoo. Maybe it's
something to do with Yahoo.
--
John H

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Self-obsessed Hypocrite]

Firefox
 

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:20:16 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

Firefox I've found has problems

This is not a FireFox problem by any stretch of the imagination.
FireFox correctly renders CSS. Imperfect Exploder does not.

Web page designers go for the masses (ie, IE users.)
If it "passes" the IE test, page is ok.

As FireFox gains more share IE will have to follow the OFFICIAL rules
not the REDMOND rules, or will lose even more users.

--
Q

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.

I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program.

Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by
non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and
framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed
that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program.

Later,

Tom

Is there an example that's easy to provide a link for?

Firefox
 

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

--
Q

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:37:30 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

Eisboch - off to mess around with Thunderbird now.

I love Thunderbird - it's a great client program.

Firefox I've found has problems displaying non-embedded photos - by
non-embedded, I mean photos that don't have the color curves and
framework embedded into the image. I don't think they've ever fixed
that. It's the same with Opera and that silly Mac program.

Give me an example of a page with a non-embedded photo...thanks.

Go to http://www.swsports.org/images and bring up a photo in Firefox.
Then bring it up in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you'll see the
difference.

Later,

Tom

Tom, I honestly don't see a difference. I'm using Paintshop Pro version 6.00
and Firefox 1.0.7. I viewed it in Paintshop by first saving the image to
disk, then opening it as usual.

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

Know what? I screwed up.

I can't at the moment, but I'll post an non-embedded image later.

Later,

Tom

I don't have PhotoShop or PaintShop Pro installed on this computer yet, but
I opened your pics in both IE and Firefox. Looked the same to me. One of
them hesitated in loading for a sec (Firefox) and a brief message came up
saying the image could not be displayed due to errors, but then the message
went away and the image appeared.

Eisboch

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Later,

Tom


Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Firefox
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
'Tis the season to be jolly ......
fa la la la la..... la la la la.

Eisboch :-)

I like your attitude! ;-)

Jim C.

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Later,

Tom

'Tis the season to be jolly ......
fa la la la la..... la la la la.

Eisboch :-)

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I agree, and have either admitted to my errors and/or apologized for them.

Did you miss those posts Tom?

Regardless..............have a good one.

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox.
Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will
see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?
You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/
Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)
Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not to rub
your face in it.



Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox.
Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will
see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop
and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?
You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/
Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)
Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?
Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom
I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not to
rub your face in it.



Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

We who sit and wait salute you.

--


You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be proved the
fool again. ;-)

Firefox
 

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:402vo11po49ulj9kruf4daa9b392rfeesv@4ax. com...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox.
Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will
see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop
and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not to
rub your face in it.



Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

We who sit and wait salute you.

--



You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be proved the
fool again. ;-)


Why do you keep winking at Harry?

Firefox
 

"Don White" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:402vo11po49ulj9kruf4daa9b392rfeesv@4ax .com...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one
of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox.
Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will
see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop
and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not to
rub your face in it.



Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

We who sit and wait salute you.

--



You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be proved
the fool again. ;-)


Why do you keep winking at Harry?

;-)

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one
of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox.
Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you
will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via
Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?
You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/
Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of
God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)
Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?
Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom
I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not
to rub your face in it.


Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)
We who sit and wait salute you.

--


You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be proved
the fool again. ;-)


Why do you keep winking at Harry?


Sheesh. Is that his pickup signal?

--

I think Pastor Don is jealous. as he has a thing for you. ;-)

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any
one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in
Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you
will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and
others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via
Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?
You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/
Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of
God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)
Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?
Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom
I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not
to rub your face in it.

Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)
We who sit and wait salute you.

--

You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be
proved the fool again. ;-)


Why do you keep winking at Harry?

Sheesh. Is that his pickup signal?

--

I think Pastor Don is jealous. as he has a thing for you. ;-)

I doubt he wants to take on Smithers, who obviously has the hots for me.


--
Extraordinary rendition: Outsourcing torture.

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any
one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in
Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you
will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and
others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via
Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?
You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/
Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of
God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)
Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?
Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom
I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not
to rub your face in it.

Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)
We who sit and wait salute you.

--

You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be
proved the fool again. ;-)


Why do you keep winking at Harry?

Sheesh. Is that his pickup signal?

--

I think Pastor Don is jealous. as he has a thing for you. ;-)

I doubt he wants to take on Smithers, who obviously has the hots for me.



Maybe we can set them up on a blind date.

Firefox
 

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


*JimH* wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:


On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:402vo11po49ulj9kruf4daa9b392rfeesv@4 ax.com...


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:



On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:



It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one
of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox.
Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you
will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via
Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of
God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not
to rub your face in it.


Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

We who sit and wait salute you.

--


You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be proved
the fool again. ;-)



Why do you keep winking at Harry?


Sheesh. Is that his pickup signal?

--


I think Pastor Don is jealous. as he has a thing for you. ;-)


Do you see me winking at half the men in here?

Firefox
 

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


*JimH* wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:


On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:402vo11po49ulj9kruf4daa9b392rfeesv @4ax.com...


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:



On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:



It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any
one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in
Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you
will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and
others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via
Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of
God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough not
to rub your face in it.


Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past few
nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

We who sit and wait salute you.

--

You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be
proved the fool again. ;-)



Why do you keep winking at Harry?

Sheesh. Is that his pickup signal?

--

I think Pastor Don is jealous. as he has a thing for you. ;-)

I doubt he wants to take on Smithers, who obviously has the hots for me.




Maybe we can set them up on a blind date.


Set yourself up. I'm taken.

Firefox
 

Don,
Nice to meet you. ; )


"Don White" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


*JimH* wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:


On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:402vo11po49ulj9kruf4daa9b392rfees ...


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q

wrote:



On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:



It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any
one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in
Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you
will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and
others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via
Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front
of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion
I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom

I'm man enough to admit when you are wrong, but I'm nice enough
not to rub your face in it.


Good one Harry. That was the funniest line I read over the past
few nights.

Thanks for the good laugh. ;-)

We who sit and wait salute you.

--

You (and your comrades) sit and wait? Indeed..............to be
proved the fool again. ;-)



Why do you keep winking at Harry?

Sheesh. Is that his pickup signal?

--

I think Pastor Don is jealous. as he has a thing for you. ;-)

I doubt he wants to take on Smithers, who obviously has the hots for me.




Maybe we can set them up on a blind date.
Set yourself up. I'm taken.

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom


I do not use Firefox. I use IE as that is the standard. As to Firefox and
Unix / derivatives there will always be bugs in them. For years Unix was
written mostly as senior thesis add-on. The Core was AT&T but all the
drivers etc. were add-on. They did not handle error conditions worth crap!
I remember Unix creating thousands of pages of error logs because they could
not handle a disk drive getting off track. This is a sign that the whole
operating system had lots of holes. Admitted error conditions are the
hardest thing to test, but if you need a senior thesis, and the software
works for your thesis advisor, you going to go further? Same thing will be
with Firefox and the Linux operating system. The holes may get patched
faster, but if you think it is immune to virus infection, we have a bridge
to sell you, or some money in Nigeria to transfer to you. Virus's are
written for the 90% of the world using the same operating system. Why write
for the minority?

Firefox
 

*JimH* wrote:
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Later,

Tom



Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?




MS IE Tom???? come on:-) no seriously stop it; you're just an MS groupy
because you have more money than brains.

What other explanation??? you haven't had any new system for years &
you're about to get shafted all over again & again pay them hugely to do
it to you:-) Damn the man who keeps buying Fichts?? after a 33% failure
rate?? then gets screwed around but keeps paying for the pleasure of
being a tester for E-Tec??

Anyway nice to see you admit you're wrong, but keep going you're not
even getting warmed up yet:-)

Want to actually learn to work a computer?? actually stop having to buy
new hardware every 15 mins?? crawl out from behind your endless
firewalls, filters & virus checkers?? then get yourself a proper open
source operating system. Any will do, probably to wean you off the
expensive MS Intel teat you can start with Mandriva, don't be scared
it's a doddle only average intelligence needed (leaves the liar Krause
out of course) then in no time you'll be on one on the breeding edge
distros. FC4 here & despite being a test ground for the new stuff it's a
hoot.

I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is all
you need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to help:-) The
open source community will have you doing clever things in no time at
all:-) You'll be really surprised what can actually be done with your
home snaps.

Oops there we go again you spent ages telling the NG how much you got
ripped off for a digital camera:-) the same again as the E-Tec, the
Ficht(s), MS software, it just goes on, one thing to be a little dull
but don't wear it like a crown.


K

Firefox
 

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:51:23 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:



I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is all
you need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to help:-) The
open source community will have you doing clever things in no time at
all:-) You'll be really surprised what can actually be done with your
home snaps.


Ah Karen - lovely vision of upside down womanhood that you are - I've
forgotten more about Unix and Linux than you ever possibly knew or
know. I don't use it because I don't want to.

I doubt that Tom I've been here a while & never seen anything from you
on Linux or MS for that matter; certainly nothing that would lead me to
believe you're anything but a MS payer player & prayer. I'm sure you've
forgotten that you've not been on linux, check the archives.
(before you dig yourself a hole better do some research remember liars
here are put in the Krause can with other BS artists)

Come on Tommy full of bluff make another admission, you don't use it
because you're an MS cripple.

If you were in anyway as knowledgable as your Harry like claims you'd
realise how off the planet some of them are. Tonights defending IE
against moz were a keeper for su-)


Nice to hear from you again - still trying to fool people with your
impression of intelligence I see. You need to work on it a little
more though - it's a little rough around the edges. Come to think of
it, the whole thing needs work - I know a few people down under who
could put you in touch with the proper mental health workers.

I'm sure you do Tom:-) what the Ficht users it's just bad luck help
group, the keep 'em lean & wait for the pistons to scream OB group??? or
the give your money to the dealers friends society?? all non profits for
the seriously mentally ill?


Anyway, lovely to hear from you - don't bother replying - I forgot to
put you on the Holiday Car list and I'll probably keep it that way.

No Matter Tom, but hey your insights or is that insites into browser
tech was a a pretty good gift as it was, I couldn't ask nor expect
anything more & from you certainly not better:-)

Here's an idea Tom why bother with spruiking what a clever fellow you
are?? just post a pic of your money??? before you **** it all away on
essentially empty MS boxes.

As always, all the best to you and whatever animal you are currently
cohabitating with.

That's the way Tom, the Harry bully rejoinder society, I guess it's
expensive to join?? I mean if you can all pretend the same pretend it
must be OK?? & you need to know lots of mental health people.

Have a good xmas & don't forget to post the happy snaps or mail them &
we'll fix 'em up for ya.

K

Later,

Tom

Firefox
 

Bill McKee wrote:
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:


On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:


It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom



I do not use Firefox. I use IE as that is the standard. As to Firefox and
Unix / derivatives there will always be bugs in them.

Sorry can't sit by & let the best thing siunce sliced bread get done
over without at least trying to help you. MS is the worlds originators
of "bugs" & they sell the stuff for big bucks full of them:-)



For years Unix was
written mostly as senior thesis add-on. The Core was AT&T but all the
drivers etc. were add-on. They did not handle error conditions worth crap!
I remember Unix creating thousands of pages of error logs because they could
not handle a disk drive getting off track. This is a sign that the whole
operating system had lots of holes. Admitted error conditions are the
hardest thing to test, but if you need a senior thesis, and the software
works for your thesis advisor, you going to go further?

So I guess all the really critical big systems are wrong then?? the govt
departments, USPTO?? etc etc ??? Unix when compared to toy systems like
MS is rock solid, you need to actually find out before you play lets
pretend around here.


Same thing will be
with Firefox and the Linux operating system. The holes may get patched
faster,

The "holes" as you say do get fixed & you don't need to wait & then pay
for a fix to an MS product that was marketed in a defective state.

but if you think it is immune to virus infection, we have a bridge
to sell you, or some money in Nigeria to transfer to you.

I never said there was no virus for linux but any that do come along (&
they do from time to time) are quickly & publicly dealt with by the
myriad users & groups & forums around the world & the system just gets
more secure & more solid. Compare that with how MS handle the reason
their product is so virus ridden, they blame others for not spending
enough money on security. Indeed there's a complete industry bleeding
even more money from you simpletons, selling you fixes for the defective
MS operating system. As I pointed out to sad Tommy you're all about to
be taken to the cleaners yet again but this time you'll be locked in
well & truely & probably given more troubles than you have with XP.

Virus's are
written for the 90% of the world using the same operating system. Why write
for the minority?

Or why write for those that can access exactly how their software works
via the source code & can fix a virus in no time flat, all the while
learning more of their own system.

Nope sorry I have to say don't be a cry baby & give it a try, yes being
dumbed down by MS for so long you'll have a few oopses on the carpet but
once you get into the swing of it you'll learn what your machine can
really be made to do & you'll have access to more software than you can
imagine, gee you might even contribute some yourself.

Come on be like big bad E-Tec dealer lacky Tommy & admit you're just
scared of finding out.


K

Firefox
 

*JimH* wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote in message ...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:51:23 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:




I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is all you
need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to help:-) The open
source community will have you doing clever things in no time at all:-)
You'll be really surprised what can actually be done with your home
snaps.


Ah Karen - lovely vision of upside down womanhood that you are - I've
forgotten more about Unix and Linux than you ever possibly knew or
know. I don't use it because I don't want to.

I doubt that Tom I've been here a while & never seen anything from you on
Linux or MS for that matter; certainly nothing that would lead me to
believe you're anything but a MS payer player & prayer. I'm sure you've
forgotten that you've not been on linux, check the archives.
(before you dig yourself a hole better do some research remember liars
here are put in the Krause can with other BS artists)

Come on Tommy full of bluff make another admission, you don't use it
because you're an MS cripple.

If you were in anyway as knowledgable as your Harry like claims you'd
realise how off the planet some of them are. Tonights defending IE against
moz were a keeper for su-)


Nice to hear from you again - still trying to fool people with your
impression of intelligence I see. You need to work on it a little
more though - it's a little rough around the edges. Come to think of
it, the whole thing needs work - I know a few people down under who
could put you in touch with the proper mental health workers.

I'm sure you do Tom:-) what the Ficht users it's just bad luck help group,
the keep 'em lean & wait for the pistons to scream OB group??? or the give
your money to the dealers friends society?? all non profits for the
seriously mentally ill?


Anyway, lovely to hear from you - don't bother replying - I forgot to
put you on the Holiday Car list and I'll probably keep it that way.

No Matter Tom, but hey your insights or is that insites into browser tech
was a a pretty good gift as it was, I couldn't ask nor expect anything
more & from you certainly not better:-)

Here's an idea Tom why bother with spruiking what a clever fellow you
are?? just post a pic of your money??? before you **** it all away on
essentially empty MS boxes.

As always, all the best to you and whatever animal you are currently
cohabitating with.

That's the way Tom, the Harry bully rejoinder society, I guess it's
expensive to join?? I mean if you can all pretend the same pretend it must
be OK?? & you need to know lots of mental health people.

Have a good xmas & don't forget to post the happy snaps or mail them &
we'll fix 'em up for ya.

K



Why the hell are you starting a fight with Tom?????????????????????


Because he's coming out with nonsense again. This pretending to be up on
the browsers is the same sort of rubbish he puts up about E-Tec, mostly
I can & do ignore; but now he is trying to say just because he hasn't
got the wherewithal to use something good then it must be bad.

You can give a man money but you can't give him brains.

Running with dealers script only gets you so far, beit an MS dealer with
defective script or a Ficht dealer, in the end I ask if this bloke is
just another NG OT Krause clone clown BS'ter??

But hey Jim thanks for your concern; what you think he might bite me?? I
doubt it, like Krause bullies rely upon people not actually calling them
for their BS, but if he tries I'll be OK on my own thanks.

K

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:51:23 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:


I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is all
you need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to help:-) The
open source community will have you doing clever things in no time at
all:-) You'll be really surprised what can actually be done with your
home snaps.

Ah Karen - lovely vision of upside down womanhood that you are - I've
forgotten more about Unix and Linux than you ever possibly knew or
know. I don't use it because I don't want to.

Nice to hear from you again - still trying to fool people with your
impression of intelligence I see. You need to work on it a little
more though - it's a little rough around the edges. Come to think of
it, the whole thing needs work - I know a few people down under who
could put you in touch with the proper mental health workers.

Anyway, lovely to hear from you - don't bother replying - I forgot to
put you on the Holiday Car list and I'll probably keep it that way.

As always, all the best to you and whatever animal you are currently
cohabitating with.

Later,

Tom

Got ammo? Milk?

Firefox
 

Harry Krause wrote:
K. Smith wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:51:23 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:



I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is
all you need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to
help:-) The open source community will have you doing clever things
in no time at all:-) You'll be really surprised what can actually be
done with your home snaps.


Ah Karen - lovely vision of upside down womanhood that you are - I've
forgotten more about Unix and Linux than you ever possibly knew or
know. I don't use it because I don't want to.


I doubt that Tom I've been here a while & never seen anything from
you on Linux or MS for that matter; certainly nothing that would lead
me to believe you're anything but a MS payer player & prayer. I'm sure
you've forgotten that you've not been on linux, check the archives.
(before you dig yourself a hole better do some research remember liars
here are put in the Krause can with other BS artists)

Come on Tommy full of bluff make another admission, you don't use it
because you're an MS cripple.


You gotta admire this dumb bitch. She's got all the grace and elegance
of Skipper, mixed in with the insanity of Larry, and the wordsmithing
abilities of her son, Tuuk. In short, she's an escapee from the locked
ward, so old, wrinkled, ugly, bad-smelling and crone-like, her last
menopausal hot flash was in 1960.




What no sig line from the liar?? or did his MS system freeze again??? I
guess he'll need to reboot his wallet to get going again:-) Sad for a
lying failed union thug.

K

Firefox
 

"K. Smith" wrote in message ...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:51:23 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:



I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is all you
need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to help:-) The open
source community will have you doing clever things in no time at all:-)
You'll be really surprised what can actually be done with your home
snaps.


Ah Karen - lovely vision of upside down womanhood that you are - I've
forgotten more about Unix and Linux than you ever possibly knew or
know. I don't use it because I don't want to.

I doubt that Tom I've been here a while & never seen anything from you on
Linux or MS for that matter; certainly nothing that would lead me to
believe you're anything but a MS payer player & prayer. I'm sure you've
forgotten that you've not been on linux, check the archives.
(before you dig yourself a hole better do some research remember liars
here are put in the Krause can with other BS artists)

Come on Tommy full of bluff make another admission, you don't use it
because you're an MS cripple.

If you were in anyway as knowledgable as your Harry like claims you'd
realise how off the planet some of them are. Tonights defending IE against
moz were a keeper for su-)


Nice to hear from you again - still trying to fool people with your
impression of intelligence I see. You need to work on it a little
more though - it's a little rough around the edges. Come to think of
it, the whole thing needs work - I know a few people down under who
could put you in touch with the proper mental health workers.

I'm sure you do Tom:-) what the Ficht users it's just bad luck help group,
the keep 'em lean & wait for the pistons to scream OB group??? or the give
your money to the dealers friends society?? all non profits for the
seriously mentally ill?


Anyway, lovely to hear from you - don't bother replying - I forgot to
put you on the Holiday Car list and I'll probably keep it that way.

No Matter Tom, but hey your insights or is that insites into browser tech
was a a pretty good gift as it was, I couldn't ask nor expect anything
more & from you certainly not better:-)

Here's an idea Tom why bother with spruiking what a clever fellow you
are?? just post a pic of your money??? before you **** it all away on
essentially empty MS boxes.

As always, all the best to you and whatever animal you are currently
cohabitating with.

That's the way Tom, the Harry bully rejoinder society, I guess it's
expensive to join?? I mean if you can all pretend the same pretend it must
be OK?? & you need to know lots of mental health people.

Have a good xmas & don't forget to post the happy snaps or mail them &
we'll fix 'em up for ya.

K


Why the hell are you starting a fight with Tom?????????????????????

Firefox
 

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:41:19 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:

So I guess all the really critical big systems are wrong then?? the govt
departments, USPTO?? etc etc ??? Unix when compared to toy systems like
MS is rock solid, you need to actually find out before you play lets
pretend around here.

The FreeBSD'ers have a web site somewhere they have a list of the
longest uptime servers. Measured in years. Mostly unixes of some
varity.

Linux is the operating system for those tired of Windows
FreeBSD is the OS of choice for those tired of the linux holy wars.

--
Q

Firefox
 

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:51:23 +1100, "K. Smith" wrote:



I'm sure other linux users will assist you as will I, just ask is all
you need do, as with your OB engine problems we're here to help:-) The
open source community will have you doing clever things in no time at
all:-) You'll be really surprised what can actually be done with your
home snaps.


Ah Karen - lovely vision of upside down womanhood that you are - I've
forgotten more about Unix and Linux than you ever possibly knew or
know. I don't use it because I don't want to.

Nice to hear from you again - still trying to fool people with your
impression of intelligence I see. You need to work on it a little
more though - it's a little rough around the edges. Come to think of
it, the whole thing needs work - I know a few people down under who
could put you in touch with the proper mental health workers.

Anyway, lovely to hear from you - don't bother replying - I forgot to
put you on the Holiday Car list and I'll probably keep it that way.

As always, all the best to you and whatever animal you are currently
cohabitating with.

Later,

Tom

Tom...you are a real bad ass when provoked. ;-)
Nice to see you straighten out some of the flotsam & jetsam that infects
here.

Firefox
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

I don't much like MS application software, but the OS seems fine to me.

Whattya...nuts? Excel is a dream, and has been from day one!

Firefox
 

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...


Anyway, I'm thinking of uncovering the Halman and sailing it next week
- don't know yet - gotta see what the weather does.

Wanna go along? :)

Later,

Tom



Isn't it a bit nipply out for sailing? :-)