Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... doesn't change anything. Not the charges against Libby Horsepoop. The charges of Libby stem from the fact that Fitzgerald believed that Libby was lying when he said that "all the press already knew about Plame" and that he may have found out about Plame from them. Since Woodward's testimony corroborates Libby's testimony, it's impossible for the perjury charges to stick. Fitzgerald's entire timeline blew up in his face with the Woodward testimony. Maybe, maybe not, but Fitzgerald is still investigating and the fat lady still hasn't sung. What does Barney Frank have to do with it? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:25:09 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Horsepoop. The charges of Libby stem from the fact that Fitzgerald believed that Libby was lying when he said that "all the press already knew about Plame" and that he may have found out about Plame from them. Since Woodward's testimony corroborates Libby's testimony, it's impossible for the perjury charges to stick. Fitzgerald's entire timeline blew up in his face with the Woodward testimony. Come on, NOYB, we have both read the indictment. That is not the reasoning behind the charges. And, the timeline *hasn't changed. Fitzgerald has Libby learning of Plame's status as early as June 11 or 12. Woodward learned about her status mid-June. Seems to fit quite nicely. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|