| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Abuses as bad as under dictator, claims Allawi
"DSK" wrote in message . .. "Sir Rodney Smithers" wrote I do agree that all politicos are crooks, but there is a world of difference between Bush and Kerry. Boy is there ever. Even the most whacked-out Nader enthusiast could not pretend that there was no difference between Bush & Kerry, although some of the Baradnick people tried... or at least, they said they believed it.... ... I for one would prefer a moderate Republican or Democrat over the two extremes we had to chose from in the last election. If you tink Kerry is "extreme" then you are guilty of believing the Bush-Cheney spinmeisters instead of your own two eyes... maybe because your eyes were shut tight... Doug Kanter wrote: Kerry doesn't enter into this issue at the moment. Of course he does. All the Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders have to offer is a continual chorus of "Clinton was worse! Kerry would have been worse! Sqwaa-aark! Polly wanna cracker!" .....The Middle East is what it is, and no amount of force can change that. That's not true. The Middle East *will* change if we apply enough force at the right places. Say for example we nuke the place. That would certainly bring about a very large change. A slightly less extreme alternative would be to kill 30% of the male population of one or two given countries... that would render it far more difficult... maybe impossible... for them to wage any kind of war. And it would certainly alter the politics of the region quite drastically. In Iraq, we are in effect taking a can of peas, slapping a label on it that says "chicken soup", and wondering why the can still contains peas. I like that analogy. Mind if I use it too? Thanks DSK Be my guest. |
Threaded Mode
