On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:12:16 -0500, John Gaquin wrote:


to portray Delahunt on a par with Kennedy in at least one area, or to try
to neutralize just one of the factors that would make Joe Kennedy a
friendly candidate to so many folks here.

Perhaps, but I would expect Delahunt is just an accidental beneficiary of
Chavez's "geopolitical weapon". Chavez has been using Venezuela's oil
wealth to expand his influence in the Americas, and to undercut American
"imperialism". He just loves to tweak our noses. Robertson calls for his
assassination, and he responds with "cheap oil".

http://news.tradingcharts.com/futures/7/2/72524327.html

"thunder" wrote in message

Perhaps, but I would expect Delahunt is just an accidental beneficiary of
Chavez's "geopolitical weapon".

Perhaps. You may well be right. Even if initiated by Chavez, however, I
suspect the choice of Delahunt as his mark was not wholly accidental.

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:59:06 -0500, John Gaquin wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message

Perhaps, but I would expect Delahunt is just an accidental beneficiary
of Chavez's "geopolitical weapon".

Perhaps. You may well be right. Even if initiated by Chavez, however, I
suspect the choice of Delahunt as his mark was not wholly accidental.

I wouldn't argue that. Someone ought to tell NewsMax, though. Delahunt
isn't even mentioned.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...2/171616.shtml

"thunder" wrote in message
...

Perhaps, but I would expect Delahunt is just an accidental beneficiary of
Chavez's "geopolitical weapon". Chavez has been using Venezuela's oil
wealth to expand his influence in the Americas, and to undercut American
"imperialism". He just loves to tweak our noses. Robertson calls for his
assassination, and he responds with "cheap oil".


You betcha ... and a stupid beneficiary he proves to be. God, do I dislike
politicians.

Eisboch