Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type reporting: http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on behalf of CNN? It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons in their midst. They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it. Bull. So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable television studio technology, eh? Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it is to do. So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first class computer? Game on. Eh? I don't watch Faux. The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my "advisors" trump yours. I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting together a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely science. I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered the challenge. The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful desktop you can put together. I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand completely. |