Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.


Well...journalists *do* tend to be more educated.

NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.

Absolutely! There are more and more people all the time who refuse to
goose step to BushCo, ergo more and more people that, because of their
narrow mindedness, the right wing would deem anti-Bush/anti-Republican

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.


They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.

*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.


They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.
\
Show what you know, Jim. How do you know for a fact that their claim
was "Bull"?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post,
CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican
persons in their midst.


They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.




So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?



Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it is to
do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first class
computer? Game on. Eh?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right
up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned
that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post,
CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican
persons in their midst.

They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.



So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?



Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it is
to do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first class
computer? Game on. Eh?


I don't watch Faux.

The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since
you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could
put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my
"advisors" trump yours.

I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting together
a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely science.



I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered
the challenge.

The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful
desktop you can put together.

I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand
completely.

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:59:53 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm


Nothing new about that!
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite