OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:06:43 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

--
Clinton ruined a dress; Bush ruined a nation.

....and Krause does his best to ruin a news group.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:36:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

--
Hurricane Bush - the Real Disaster

....Zimmerman style Lobsta boat - the Real Deal!
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked
right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned
that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest".
Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting
on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington
Post, CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue
anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons in their midst.

They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.



So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?


Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it
is to do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first
class computer? Game on. Eh?

I don't watch Faux.

The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since
you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could
put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my
"advisors" trump yours.

I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting
together a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely
science.



I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered
the challenge.

The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful
desktop you can put together.

I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand
completely.


Why would that interest me, when all I wanted to do was put together a
desktop that suited my personal needs? This is the fourth or fifth I've
built over the years, beginning way back with a '386.


--

As I said earlier, fine. I guess you once again pass and that is not a
problem. I understand
completely.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:09:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked
right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned
that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest".
Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting
on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington
Post, CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue
anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons in their midst.

They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.



So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?

Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it
is to do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first
class computer? Game on. Eh?
I don't watch Faux.

The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since
you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could
put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my
"advisors" trump yours.

I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting
together a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely
science.


I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered
the challenge.

The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful
desktop you can put together.

I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand
completely.

Why would that interest me, when all I wanted to do was put together a
desktop that suited my personal needs? This is the fourth or fifth I've
built over the years, beginning way back with a '386.


--

As I said earlier, fine. I guess you once again pass and that is not a
problem. I understand
completely.




PasS? What the hell are you talking about now?

Perhaps he's talking about your brash posts with a tail-tucked turnaround
when you're shown some relevant information, Harry.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

--
As I said earlier, fine. I guess you once again pass and that is not a
problem. I understand
completely.



PasS? What the hell are you talking about now?

Perhaps he's talking about your brash posts with a tail-tucked turnaround
when you're shown some relevant information, Harry.


When in your lives have you or Hert been...relevant?



I thought you said you would drop the insults and remain civil with me
Harry? I bought into that and have kept my side of the bargain.

I will forgive you this time.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:30:23 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.



at this point about 70% of the country fits in that category.

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:35:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


If it had been me, I would have run 666 under Cheney's photo.


now THAT'S funny!
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:


CNN has been supporting leftist causes, either on their own or at the behest
of certain groups, for years. My first direct knowledge of this was at
least 15 years ago.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Uh-huh. And you have all the names of those groups and the evidence right
there on that folded piece of paper in your suit jacket...

Don't need it. When you're part and parcel of what's going on, and you then
see the events portrayed on the news in some unrecognizable fashion,
repeatedly, there's no need to take notes.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:58:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:


CNN has been supporting leftist causes, either on their own or at the behest
of certain groups, for years. My first direct knowledge of this was at
least 15 years ago.



Uh-huh. And you have all the names of those groups and the evidence
right there on that folded piece of paper in your suit jacket...


harry...you gotta keep up with technology...it's all satellites and
microwaves now...that's why tin foil hats are de rigeur among the
righties...

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field