OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.


Well...journalists *do* tend to be more educated.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.

Absolutely! There are more and more people all the time who refuse to
goose step to BushCo, ergo more and more people that, because of their
narrow mindedness, the right wing would deem anti-Bush/anti-Republican

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.


They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

wrote in message
oups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.


They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.
\
Show what you know, Jim. How do you know for a fact that their claim
was "Bull"?

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post,
CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican
persons in their midst.


They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.




So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?



Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it is to
do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first class
computer? Game on. Eh?

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right
up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned
that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post,
CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican
persons in their midst.

They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.



So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?



Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it is
to do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first class
computer? Game on. Eh?


I don't watch Faux.

The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since
you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could
put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my
"advisors" trump yours.

I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting together
a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely science.



I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered
the challenge.

The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful
desktop you can put together.

I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand
completely.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:59:53 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:

Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm


Nothing new about that!
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:06:43 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

--
Clinton ruined a dress; Bush ruined a nation.

....and Krause does his best to ruin a news group.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:36:07 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

--
Hurricane Bush - the Real Disaster

....Zimmerman style Lobsta boat - the Real Deal!
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked
right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned
that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest".
Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting
on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington
Post, CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue
anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons in their midst.

They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.



So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?


Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it
is to do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first
class computer? Game on. Eh?

I don't watch Faux.

The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since
you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could
put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my
"advisors" trump yours.

I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting
together a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely
science.



I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered
the challenge.

The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful
desktop you can put together.

I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand
completely.


Why would that interest me, when all I wanted to do was put together a
desktop that suited my personal needs? This is the fourth or fifth I've
built over the years, beginning way back with a '386.


--

As I said earlier, fine. I guess you once again pass and that is not a
problem. I understand
completely.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:09:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked
right up there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm
It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned
that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest".
Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting
on
behalf of CNN?
It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington
Post, CBS news, and CNN always seem to have rogue
anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons in their midst.

They claimed it was a computer glitch and they could not recreate it.

Bull.



So, in addition to your talents as a photographer and an assembler of
computer parts, you have expertise in the operation of high-tech cable
television studio technology, eh?

Hee-hee-hee. Watch Fox tonight, I am sure they will show how easy it
is to do.

So you again challenge me to a contest on putting together a first
class computer? Game on. Eh?
I don't watch Faux.

The desktop machine I recently assembled suits my needs very well. Since
you have no idea of what my computer needs are, it is unlikely you could
put together one that would serve me "better." Oh, and I suspect my
"advisors" trump yours.

I have no idea why you are making a big deal out of this. Putting
together a good desktop computer is not rocket science. It's barely
science.


I am not making a big deal of it. You resurrected it and I again offered
the challenge.

The challenge is for listing components for the *best* and most powerful
desktop you can put together.

I guess you once again pass and that is not a problem. I understand
completely.

Why would that interest me, when all I wanted to do was put together a
desktop that suited my personal needs? This is the fourth or fifth I've
built over the years, beginning way back with a '386.


--

As I said earlier, fine. I guess you once again pass and that is not a
problem. I understand
completely.




PasS? What the hell are you talking about now?

Perhaps he's talking about your brash posts with a tail-tucked turnaround
when you're shown some relevant information, Harry.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

--
As I said earlier, fine. I guess you once again pass and that is not a
problem. I understand
completely.



PasS? What the hell are you talking about now?

Perhaps he's talking about your brash posts with a tail-tucked turnaround
when you're shown some relevant information, Harry.


When in your lives have you or Hert been...relevant?



I thought you said you would drop the insults and remain civil with me
Harry? I bought into that and have kept my side of the bargain.

I will forgive you this time.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:30:23 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

It happened for 1/15 of a second. Please show where you've gleaned that
this was an act of CNN as a whole, and that they are "dishonest". Do
you not think that this could be the act of ONE PERSON, not acting on
behalf of CNN?

It is more than a coincidence that the NY Times, the Washington Post, CBS
news, and CNN always seem to have rogue anti-Bush/anti-Republican persons
in their midst.



at this point about 70% of the country fits in that category.

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:35:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


If it had been me, I would have run 666 under Cheney's photo.


now THAT'S funny!
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:


CNN has been supporting leftist causes, either on their own or at the behest
of certain groups, for years. My first direct knowledge of this was at
least 15 years ago.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Uh-huh. And you have all the names of those groups and the evidence right
there on that folded piece of paper in your suit jacket...

Don't need it. When you're part and parcel of what's going on, and you then
see the events portrayed on the news in some unrecognizable fashion,
repeatedly, there's no need to take notes.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:58:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:
NOYB wrote:
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there
with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:


CNN has been supporting leftist causes, either on their own or at the behest
of certain groups, for years. My first direct knowledge of this was at
least 15 years ago.



Uh-huh. And you have all the names of those groups and the evidence
right there on that folded piece of paper in your suit jacket...


harry...you gotta keep up with technology...it's all satellites and
microwaves now...that's why tin foil hats are de rigeur among the
righties...

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:kJ-


I had no idea you were involved in preparing bad intel for our very own
Presidummy Bush.

The list of things about which you have no idea is long and distinguished.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:kJ-


I had no idea you were involved in preparing bad intel for our very own
Presidummy Bush.

The list of things about which you have no idea is long and
distinguished.


They don't make paper long enough for that list.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm


CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the operator
claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's face was "free
speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and Cheney,"
the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers home."

The caller initially phoned the network to complain about the all-news
channel flashing an "X' over Cheney as he gave an address live from
Washington.

"Was it not freedom of speech? Yes or No?" the CNN operator explained.

"If you don't like it, don't watch."

Laurie Goldberg, Senior Vice President for Public Relations with CNN, said
in a release:

"A Turner switchboard operator was fired today after we were alerted to a
conversation the operator had with a caller in which the operator lost his
temper and expressed his personal views -- behavior that was totally
inappropriate. His comments did not reflect the views of CNN. We are
reaching out to the caller and expressing our deep regret to her and
apologizing that she did not get the courtesy entitled to her. "

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest, dirty-pool-type
reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm


CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's face
was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers home."

The caller initially phoned the network to complain about the all-news
channel flashing an "X' over Cheney as he gave an address live from
Washington.

"Was it not freedom of speech? Yes or No?" the CNN operator explained.

"If you don't like it, don't watch."

Laurie Goldberg, Senior Vice President for Public Relations with CNN, said
in a release:

"A Turner switchboard operator was fired today after we were alerted to a
conversation the operator had with a caller in which the operator lost his
temper and expressed his personal views -- behavior that was totally
inappropriate. His comments did not reflect the views of CNN. We are
reaching out to the caller and expressing our deep regret to her and
apologizing that she did not get the courtesy entitled to her. "




Great!!!!!

Thanks NOYB!

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm


CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's face
was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers home."


Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its quest to
avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.

Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's
face was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers home."

Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its quest to
avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.

Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.



I could...wouldn't *that* be a nightmare for guys like you.

--


I doubt it. Fox has higher standards Harry. ;-)

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's
face was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers home."

Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its quest to
avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.

Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.



I could...wouldn't *that* be a nightmare for guys like you.

Not really. Nobody but liberals pays attention to the Clinton News Network
anyhow.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

Harry,
NO news agency would ever hire you. You would destroy any credibility they
have or would strive to have. You say you are a private contractor, but
your work load is none existent, so it appears that not many people are
willing to hire you in any capacity.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right up
there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's
face was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers home."

Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its quest to
avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.

Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.



I could...wouldn't *that* be a nightmare for guys like you.

--
/bush

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked right
up there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE
SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's
face was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers
home."

Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its quest
to avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.
Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.


I could...wouldn't *that* be a nightmare for guys like you.

Not really. Nobody but liberals pays attention to the Clinton News
Network anyhow.




You should look beyond Rasmussen, Faux and Screwsmax. A growing number of
Americans have had it with the kind of right-wing lunacy you espouse.


You should get off the internet, and expand your circle of acquaintances. I
see and talk to 100 different patients every week. None hold the animosity
towards Bush that you seem to indicate exists.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked
right
up there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE
SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick Cheney's
face was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers
home."

Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its
quest
to avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.
Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.


I could...wouldn't *that* be a nightmare for guys like you.

Not really. Nobody but liberals pays attention to the Clinton News
Network anyhow.




You should look beyond Rasmussen, Faux and Screwsmax. A growing number
of
Americans have had it with the kind of right-wing lunacy you espouse.


You should get off the internet, and expand your circle of acquaintances.
I
see and talk to 100 different patients every week. None hold the
animosity
towards Bush that you seem to indicate exists.



"narcissistic adults have had decades of not being in synch with the times
or with other people, so that by now they are really out of it. Sometimes it
just seems like they have a highly selective memory -- which, of course,
they do, sort of; they pay attention only to what has their name in it in
the first place, so after 30 or 40 years"

"Narcissists are noted for their negative, pessimistic, cynical, or gloomy
outlook on life. Sarcasm seems to be a narcissistic specialty, not to
mention spite. Lacking love and pleasure, they don't have a good reason for
anything they do and they think everyone else is just like them, except
they're honest and the rest of us are hypocrites. Nothing real is ever
perfect enough to satisfy them, so are they are constantly complaining and
criticizing -- to the point of verbal abuse and insult. "

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

NOYB wrote:

You should get off the internet, and expand your circle of acquaintances. I
see and talk to 100 different patients every week. None hold the animosity
towards Bush that you seem to indicate exists.


Yeah sure! Since your patients must be aware of your rabid support of
George W, they would probably hold their true feelings while you're
poking around their mouths with sharp instruments.

OT--Add CNN to the list of dishonest, partisan news organizations
 

"P Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Not that we didn't already know it, but CNN can now be ranked
right
up there with the Washington Post and NY Times in dishonest,
dirty-pool-type reporting:

http://drudgereport.com/flash4cnc.htm

CNN OPERATOR FIRED AFTER SUGGESTING 'X' OVER CHENEY WAS 'FREE
SPEECH'

A CNN switchboard operator was fired over the holiday -- after the
operator claimed the 'X' placed over Vice President's Dick
Cheney's
face was "free speech!"

"We did it just to make a point. Tell them to stop lying, Bush and
Cheney," the CNN operator said to a caller. "Bring our soldiers
home."

Well, it was kinder and gentler than the crap Faux spews in its
quest
to avoid being fair.

I would have run 666 under the photo of Cheney.
Good for you. But you don't work for a major news organization.


I could...wouldn't *that* be a nightmare for guys like you.

Not really. Nobody but liberals pays attention to the Clinton News
Network anyhow.




You should look beyond Rasmussen, Faux and Screwsmax. A growing number
of
Americans have had it with the kind of right-wing lunacy you espouse.


You should get off the internet, and expand your circle of acquaintances.
I
see and talk to 100 different patients every week. None hold the
animosity
towards Bush that you seem to indicate exists.



"narcissistic adults have had decades of not being in synch with the times
or with other people, so that by now they are really out of it.

Well, that explains it.



"Narcissists are noted for their negative, pessimistic, cynical, or gloomy
outlook on life. Sarcasm seems to be a narcissistic specialty, not to
mention spite.

You just can't make this stuff up!