"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
.... invoke Clinton's name?


Dan J.S. wrote:
Because Clinton let Osama get away.

??

How so?

Oh wait, I know... instead of bombing the aspirin factories (funny how the
American right wing now gets it's info from Russian propaganda sources),
CLinton should have accepted Sudan's offer to hog-tie Osama and torture
him for us...

1- that's a fantasy on the same level as Clinton selling dope to school
kids, which has been said by some of the foamier-at-the-mouth
Clinton-haters

2- Osama had not claimed responsibility for attacks on the U.S. yet. Was
Clinton supposed to foresee the future?

No, it's President Bush who vowed to get Osama and then let him slip away.

Painful, but true.

... You know why Saddam didnt launch anything at us? Because we got him
first.

Really? You mean during the 8 months or so that he was on the loose after
we invaded his country, he had no opportunity to make a phone call and say
"Yes, unleash ouor WMDs on the Americans"? It would not have taken much
from his busy schedule.

Funny how nobody with an actual real-life clue believes that Saddam
Hussein had any WMDs after the 1st Gulf War (we know he had them before,
Bush & Rumsfeld sold them to him) or that he had any ties with Al Queda.

You may find it a lot more comfortable to stay wrapped in your fantasy
world rather than venture out here into cold harsh reality-land.

DSK


The WMDs are in Syria or Iran.

But besides that, we also invaded Iraq to keep pressure on Saudi. We could
not lay sanctions against them directly, by invading Iraq we did an indirect
attack on Saudi. There are politics all over.

And dont talk to me about harsh reality. I spent 4 years in the Marines
(89-93) so I saw my share of what Saddam is capable off. That is harsh
reality.