Kevin,
He illegally cuts and pastes copyrighted material 10's of time a day.


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing, so
he
doesn't place any value on others intelligent property.

Please show what proof you have of your above allegations.

Curtis CCR wrote:

The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up. He acts like a child.
I am sure it is one of the reasons he is still violating copyrights by
posting articles as he does to rec.boats. This was all explained to
him months ago and instead of saying "You're right, I'll stop," or even
just quietly ceasing the behavior, he acts as if, "Nobody is going to
tell me that what I am doing is wrong. And to PROVE it, I will
continue to do just what I am doing."

If Harry started posting news and the opinions of others' in compliance
with fair use, he probably figures he would be admitting that somebody
schooled him. And nobody can teach Harry anything. Going by my
recollection of posts where he talked about learning lessons, it would
appear that his father is the only person Harry will admit taught him
anything.

Who taught him to be an asshole?

Very well said!

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:

Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

And you wonder why your kind is so reviled. To me, you seem much like
the back end of a Caribou. Always going in the wrong direction and the
only thing coming out is...

--
Skipper

Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

verificable

huh?

The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up.


Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and
what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in
the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy,
explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off.

Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right -
Why expend the energy?

Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

verificable

huh?

The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up.

Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and
what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in
the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy,
explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off.

Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right -
Why expend the energy?

What I asked was, why should I expend energy answering your whining with
a long, reasoned response? Still waiting.

I think the whinning everyone hears is you. "sniff sniff Why should
I... sniff sniff Why should I... You're not the boss of me! sniff
sniff."

Forget about my calling you a child. I and others have pointed out
that you violated Andy Borowitz's copyrights by distributing his
article in this newsgroup without permission. There are several ways
you can respond. You choose.

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:51:29 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Curtis CCR wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

verificable

huh?

The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up.


Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

You shouldn't. Just accept it.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:33:08 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Skipper wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:

Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

And you wonder why your kind is so reviled. To me, you seem much like
the back end of a Caribou. Always going in the wrong direction and the
only thing coming out is...

--
Skipper


Tell us, Adolf...what is my "kind." Try to be specific.

The kind that would make BS allegations and then whine out of presenting the
(nonexistent) proof?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"Curtis CCR" wrote in message
oups.com...

Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

verificable

huh?

The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a
typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start
replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground
insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up.

Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining
little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned
response?
Please tell me why.

Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and
what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in
the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy,
explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off.

Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right -
Why expend the energy?

What I asked was, why should I expend energy answering your whining with
a long, reasoned response? Still waiting.

I think the whinning everyone hears is you. "sniff sniff Why should
I... sniff sniff Why should I... You're not the boss of me! sniff
sniff."

Forget about my calling you a child. I and others have pointed out
that you violated Andy Borowitz's copyrights by distributing his
article in this newsgroup without permission. There are several ways
you can respond. You choose.


If you keep taking his bait then he has shown he is the boss of you.

Harry,
You cut and paste in violation of copyright laws because you do not respect
others intellectual property. The correct and legal way to "post an
article" is to include the headline, 2 or 3 sentences, and then a link to
the page of the article. That way, the owner of the article, and the
publisher of the article will have the readers on their site.

If you had spent time creating intellectual property you would understand
why cut and pasting it is stealing from the author and publisher.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Curtis CCR wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Curtis CCR wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:
verificable
huh?
The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up.

Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

Hell, Harry, the best stuff you post is created by other people, and
what does it take to post one liners about a person's ass and a hole in
the ground? But hey! If you would like to START expending energy,
explain why I am wrong about your post being a copyright rip off.

Of course, you won't be able to explain it. So maybe you're right -
Why expend the energy?


Here's a real simple answer for you, Curtis. I hope you understand it.

Some weeks ago, I decided when I quoted a news article, I'd only post a
handful of paragraphs, along with a comment of my one. That makes my
reposting fair play.

Lo and behold, half the right-wing asses here whined that I was not
posting the whole article and they accused me of leaving out the good
stuff.

So, I post an entire article, credit it properly, and voila, half the
right-wing asses whine about that. The funny thing is, two of the asses
that whined when I clipped the articles are now whining about the longer
versions.

My conclusion: they've caught Smithers Flu.

But at least harry reads it first to make sure it aligns with his "goose
stepping lemmings" ideology :-)


"Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote in
message ...
Kevin,
He illegally cuts and pastes copyrighted material 10's of time a day.


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote:
Harry has never created any intelligent property worthy of stealing,
so
he
doesn't place any value on others intelligent property.

Please show what proof you have of your above allegations.