On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:51:29 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Curtis CCR wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:03:02 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

verificable

huh?

The best Harry could respond with was a lame attempt to exploit a typo.

He has been caught in the wrong once again and will now start replying
to every post with one or two sentence, 4th grade, playground insults.

That is the way he works when he gets jacked up.


Curtis: why should I expend any energy responding to your whining little
complaints? You actually think you are worth a long, reasoned response?
Please tell me why.

You shouldn't. Just accept it.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes