On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote:

How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of Homeland
Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528 grant
for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who will
train the firefighters on "healthy eating.''

Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has cost
us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish color
coding system.

what's the problem? nutrition is an essential component of maintaining
the capabilities of first responders. you change the oil in fire
trucks, why not maintain the engines of firefighters?

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote:

How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of Homeland
Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528 grant
for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who will
train the firefighters on "healthy eating.''

Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has cost
us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish color
coding system.

Fairfield where?

CA

Whose House District is Fairfield, CA?

Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes, that
it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The
Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly.

Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it seems
with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to
know who is the Rep for that District.

So I looked it up.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/

A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure. Interesting.

Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm

How about that huh?

What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came up
with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes?

No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I
pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who,
oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of
thing.

You can't have it both ways.

I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security
Act, with all of it's pork loopholes?

wrote in message
oups.com...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote:

How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of
Homeland
Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528
grant
for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who
will
train the firefighters on "healthy eating.''

Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has
cost
us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish
color
coding system.

Fairfield where?

CA

Whose House District is Fairfield, CA?

Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes,
that
it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The
Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly.

Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it seems
with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to
know who is the Rep for that District.

So I looked it up.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/

A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure. Interesting.

Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm

How about that huh?

What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came up
with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes?

No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I
pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who,
oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of
thing.

You can't have it both ways.

I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security
Act, with all of it's pork loopholes?


Both.

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote:

How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department of
Homeland
Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a $115,528
grant
for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist who
will
train the firefighters on "healthy eating.''

Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act has
cost
us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a childish
color
coding system.

Fairfield where?

CA

Whose House District is Fairfield, CA?

Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes,
that
it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The
Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly.

Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it seems
with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to
know who is the Rep for that District.

So I looked it up.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/

A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure. Interesting.

Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm

How about that huh?

What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came up
with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes?

No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I
pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who,
oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of
thing.

You can't have it both ways.

I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security
Act, with all of it's pork loopholes?


Both.

Really? Someone from both parties initiated the bill????? Who were they?

wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 13:38:18 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 10:08:37 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 06:29:07 -0800, wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 05:16:02 -0800, wrote:

How's this for a terrorist alert -- the federal Department
of
Homeland
Security just awarded the Fairfield Fire Department a
$115,528
grant
for exercise equipment and the services of a nutritionist
who
will
train the firefighters on "healthy eating.''

Just think how many millions of taxpayer's dollars this act
has
cost
us! And what was gained by it? Crap like this, and a
childish
color
coding system.

Fairfield where?

CA

Whose House District is Fairfield, CA?

Uh, what difference would that make? The bill is so full of holes,
that
it allows for this ****, and I suppose you think it's grand? The
Department of Homeland Security is Bush's folly.

Curiosity is all and it doesn't really make a difference, but it
seems
with all the hootin' and hollerin' I thought it might be useful to
know who is the Rep for that District.

So I looked it up.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/

A Democrat. And on the House Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure. Interesting.

Oh, and here's her take on the Fairfield Fire Department.

http://www.house.gov/tauscher/Press2005/10-26-05-02.htm

How about that huh?

What you, JimH, and Fritz fail to note is WHAT political group came
up
with the Homeland Security Act, and all of it's pork filled holes?

No, you made fun of the Fairfleid Fire Departments grant and I
pointed out that it was fully supported by their Representative who,
oddly enough, serves on the very committee that oversees this kind of
thing.

You can't have it both ways.

I'll ask again. What party is responsible for the Homeland Security
Act, with all of it's pork loopholes?


Both.

Really? Someone from both parties initiated the bill????? Who were they?


Where does responsible mean initiated? Was the bill voted on party lines?