Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Smith Smithers wrote: Chuck, For years, whenever someone mentioned the signal to noise ratio in rec.boats, you chided them to start on topic posts. You would always comment that the OT posts concerning OT posts just added to the signal to noise ratio. You also chided these people not to expect the regulars in rec.boats to entertain them, that is was their responsibility to make on topic posts. Harry is positively the worst offender for starting OT threads. Harry's only purpose in coming to rec.boats is to troll for OT political threads and he prides himself in being very effective in his OT trolls. As long as he is regular to rec.boats, I can promise you there will not be any change in the tone of rec.boats. I continue to believe that starting on-topic threads is the answer. I start as many on-topic threads as anybody, far more than some. The responses you're refering to are typically offered to some previously unheard of screen name who jumps in with, "What the hell is wrong with you guys? I've been watching this NG for two weeks, trying to figure out how to rebuild the pump on my manual marine toilet and all I see are personal feuds, political arguments, and OT crap." Harry sets the tone in the Newsgroup only because he has attracted a group of emotionally needy folks who *must* engage Harry every day and *must* respond to each and every one of his trolls with venom and spite. I'm sure Harry gets quite the kick out of manipulating people as skillfully as he does, and probably laughs his butt off as he realizes that his detractors are doing exactly what he needs and expects them to do in response to his calculated stimuli. If the anti-Krause crowd hates Harry so badly, why do they allow themselves to be completely controlled by him? Responding to Harry with malice and disdain is like trying to douse a fire with a bucket of gasoline. But you know that- surely you must- as do the people who are co-dependent on his trolling. |