You are sasuming they were trained :-)

The way kevin soils himslef in this NG, I sometimes have my doubts.

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:02:44 -0400, "The One and Only Smithers"
wrote:

Harry is cute isn't he, Kevin and Harry bring joy to all who reads their
words of wit. ; )

Is it just me, or have you noticed that both Kevin and Harry seems to
harbor
some very deep seated anger.

I know you may have some doubts about my ability to diagnose psychological
problems, but I *did* minor in Psychology.

Therefore, I will say again, the problem is their potty training. The
anger they
demonstrate here is totally misdirected, unless one of us was involved in
their
potty training.

I wasn't.

Were you?

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's
just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

No, so it must be misdirected anger.




"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:02:44 -0400, "The One and Only Smithers"
wrote:

Harry is cute isn't he, Kevin and Harry bring joy to all who reads their
words of wit. ; )

Is it just me, or have you noticed that both Kevin and Harry seems to
harbor
some very deep seated anger.

I know you may have some doubts about my ability to diagnose psychological
problems, but I *did* minor in Psychology.

Therefore, I will say again, the problem is their potty training. The
anger they
demonstrate here is totally misdirected, unless one of us was involved in
their
potty training.

I wasn't.

Were you?

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's
just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

wrote in message
oups.com...
It just gets sadder, and sadder. The truly sad thing is, that the right
wing lemmings here will somehow act like this isn't a big deal!

I am not a right wing lemming, more of a centrist, and this is not a big
deal.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Dupont said the soldiers who burned the bodies said they did so for
hygiene reasons.

the rules state that bodies should not be cremated,
"except for imperative reasons of hygiene

Look at the facts:


1)There are 2 dead bodies.
2)They gave the enemy a chance to come get them ("You are too scared to come
down and retrieve their bodies").
3)The Taliban failed to come down to get the bodies
4) The bodies lay rotting in the sun
5) The soldiers cremated the bodies for hygiene reasons.

Sounds OK to me. If they were trying to desecrate the bodies, they would
have smeared them in pig ****, and *then* lit them on fire.

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:20:40 -0400, "The One and Only Smithers"
wrote:

No, so it must be misdirected anger.

Perhaps they're not sure who performed their potty training, and therefore know
not where their anger should be directed.

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:13:09 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
Dupont said the soldiers who burned the bodies said they did so for
hygiene reasons.

the rules state that bodies should not be cremated,
"except for imperative reasons of hygiene

Look at the facts:


1)There are 2 dead bodies.
2)They gave the enemy a chance to come get them ("You are too scared to come
down and retrieve their bodies").
3)The Taliban failed to come down to get the bodies
4) The bodies lay rotting in the sun
5) The soldiers cremated the bodies for hygiene reasons.

Sounds OK to me. If they were trying to desecrate the bodies, they would
have smeared them in pig ****, and *then* lit them on fire.

If the soldiers did something which violates the UCMJ, they'll be punished,
unlike Nagin.

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

wrote:
When you see the pics Guzzi-boy then believe it.

if rules are broken, then hold the breakers accountable.

No spin about it Caesarhead.

What kind of an idiot ARE you? Do you only believe what you've seen a
picture of?? I take it by picture of, you are referring to a
photograph? Do you believe in God? Seen any digital photographs of him?
By the way, your childish name calling doesn't do a whole lot for your
credibility.

PocoLoco wrote:
On 20 Oct 2005 05:08:13 -0700, presented the group with
another cut'n'paste, which he may not have read.

Kevin, perhaps you should post it another half dozen times.

I'm not Kevin, you dolt.

Have you discussed your potty training with an adult in your life?

You've asked that tens of times before, just like the "Harry, you're a
****ing liar" post. Drinking heavily again? So, just to set the
newsgroup straight, what would make you think that I need to discuss my
"potty training" with anyone? Are you jealous because I'm not an over
the hill, mustered out of the army, crotchety old fart that has proved
himself to be a low life scum bag here, like YOU?


How can you
make comments about another's wife, yet go bananas when someone mentions either
of your parents?

Who's wife, dip****?

Do you see any logic in this?


I'll ask again. Do you find it above board, a nice, friendly gesture,
and not low classed to bring someone's long dead parents into a
discussion, just because you don't know what you are talking about?

PocoLoco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:54:33 -0400, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"PocoLoco" wrote in message
.. .
On 20 Oct 2005 05:08:13 -0700, presented the group with
another cut'n'paste, which he may not have read.

Kevin, perhaps you should post it another half dozen times.

Have you discussed your potty training with an adult in your life? How can
you
make comments about another's wife, yet go bananas when someone mentions
either
of your parents?

Do you see any logic in this?

Kevin is "Stuck on Stupid"

Well, I'm trying not to get into calling names, but he sure does make it rough.

Then quit calling me Kevin, you dumb ass.

I honestly believe he can work through some of his problems with the right help.
I would like to see some of his liberal friends giving him some help also, but I
can understand their reluctance to do so. He'd probably start calling them names
also!

Unlike you, most people have a life outside of this newsgroup, you low
life piece of ****!

PocoLoco wrote:

If the soldiers did something which violates the UCMJ, they'll be punished,
unlike Nagin.

How did Nagin violate the UCMJ???? Damn, you're dumb.