"Skipper" wrote in message
...
wrote:

IMO, the remarks WERE on topic and accurate. His bailout on the
Rec.Boats photo site was abrupt and motivated by pique. His pure
abandonment allowed a spammer to take it over and promote his commercial
site. What did you find inaccurate in my remarks?

Accurate, Shmackurate Psuedo:

One could respond to every one of your posts with a long litany of
Skipper and Psuedo Skipper faux paus and foolishness in the NG......but
why bother? Why make bitchy personal remarks an issue that doesn't
concern you because (1) you are not a boater and (2) except for
charter fishing down in the Gulf of CA on somebody else's boat, you
rarely ever ventured off the duck ponds of KS?

Some don't know the difference between a useful, on-topic contribution
and a bitchy personal remark.

Congrats on your whiny bitchy personal remarks, Chucky. After all, this
is the prevaricating rad/lib shyster that we are getting to know so very
very well:

http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

And after all his accusations about others being you he is now spinning his
story that this Skipper *most likely is* you. Hee-hee-hee.

This month long saga between Chuckles and you has been nothing short of
hysterical. He sure has had his shorts in a knot during that entire time.

The *real* Chuck Gould has been uncovered.

*JimH* wrote:

And after all his accusations about others being you he is now
spinning his story that this Skipper *most likely is* you.
Hee-hee-hee.

This month long saga between Chuckles and you has been nothing short
of hysterical. He sure has had his shorts in a knot during that
entire time.

The *real* Chuck Gould has been uncovered.

He's doing the "uncovering" to himself. That's the thing about scumbags.
Does he expect his "non-boater" comments to go without a response?
Remember that post from someone bragging about how they sat around
drinking beers with their wives telling stories and laughing at
"skippy"?

--
Skipper