"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience
will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


NOYB wrote:
They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.


Good backpedal, with rhythm.
Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8



Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered.

Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not
name-calling
at all nosirree!

... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job
in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


And the conservative college professors?

Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.



Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not
disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to
a
college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have
"real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on
the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible?

The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.

Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.

Exactly......the best preof I had were the part timers that were "in" the
profession.......the worst were the ones that had never worked a day in
their lives......having gone straight from graduation to teaching........and
many of them are still there.