"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 5 Oct 2005 11:48:34 -0700, wrote:


NOYB wrote:

Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time.
Hawaiian
Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter periods
of
time.

Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend
this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are
beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest their
money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped?

Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian Tropic
girls.
I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200
cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000, and
that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl.

Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling jobs.
Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more experience
you have, and the brighter you get.

Are you trying to say that even entry level jobs are good jobs?

No......he's telling everyone why his earning power has not gone up ;-)


--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's
just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

"P Fritz" wrote in message
...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 5 Oct 2005 11:48:34 -0700, wrote:


NOYB wrote:

Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time.
Hawaiian
Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter
periods
of
time.

Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend
this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are
beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest their
money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped?

Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian Tropic
girls.
I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200
cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000, and
that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl.

Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling jobs.
Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more experience
you have, and the brighter you get.

Are you trying to say that even entry level jobs are good jobs?

No......he's telling everyone why his earning power has not gone up ;-)


Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not
change that.

NOYB wrote:
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not
change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.

Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in
the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.

On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:52:54 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
NOYB wrote:
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.

Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in
the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


Reagan said it well.

--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan

Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


NOYB wrote:
They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.


Good backpedal, with rhythm.
Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8



Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered.

Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not
name-calling at all nosirree!

... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in
the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


And the conservative college professors?

Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not
disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to
a college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have
"real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on
the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


NOYB wrote:
They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.


Good backpedal, with rhythm.
Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8



Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered.

Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not name-calling
at all nosirree!

... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job
in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


And the conservative college professors?

Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.



Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not
disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to a
college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have
"real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on
the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible?

The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.

Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience
will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


NOYB wrote:
They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.


Good backpedal, with rhythm.
Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8



Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered.

Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not
name-calling
at all nosirree!

... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job
in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


And the conservative college professors?

Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.



Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not
disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to
a
college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have
"real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on
the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible?

The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.

Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.

Exactly......the best preof I had were the part timers that were "in" the
profession.......the worst were the ones that had never worked a day in
their lives......having gone straight from graduation to teaching........and
many of them are still there.

And the conservative college professors?


NOBBY wrote:
Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.


I see... in NOBBY-World, only conservative college professors have ever
held jobs outside academia, and children of Republicans always grow up
to be conservatives...

Wait a minute, wasn't it you that pointed out something about Darwin and
pangenesis?



The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.


I think that's true in any field. Certainly in engineering & medicine.
And yet, somehow about 99% of the engineering profs I currently know are
pretty strongly anti-Bush/Cheney. Does that make them "sheltered liberals"?




Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.


Agreed, and IMHO experience in the field is necessary for anything above
the grammar school level.

BTW please read the current Jane Bryan Quinn column about the housing
market. She's right on the money.

DSK

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.

Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in
the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.

It also explains the Kennedy types, and the hollywood crowd.