| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOYB wrote: Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time. Hawaiian Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter periods of time. Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest their money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped? Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian Tropic girls. I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200 cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000, and that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl. Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling jobs. Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more experience you have, and the brighter you get. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On 5 Oct 2005 11:48:34 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time. Hawaiian Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter periods of time. Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest their money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped? Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian Tropic girls. I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200 cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000, and that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl. Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling jobs. Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more experience you have, and the brighter you get. Are you trying to say that even entry level jobs are good jobs? No......he's telling everyone why his earning power has not gone up ;-) -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"P Fritz" wrote in message ... "PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On 5 Oct 2005 11:48:34 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time. Hawaiian Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter periods of time. Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest their money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped? Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian Tropic girls. I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200 cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000, and that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl. Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling jobs. Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more experience you have, and the brighter you get. Are you trying to say that even entry level jobs are good jobs? No......he's telling everyone why his earning power has not gone up ;-) Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOYB wrote:
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter? DSK |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DSK" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter? They got wiser, not smarter. Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience. Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:52:54 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message . .. NOYB wrote: Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter? They got wiser, not smarter. Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience. Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered. Reagan said it well. -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter? NOYB wrote: They got wiser, not smarter. Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience. Good backpedal, with rhythm. Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8 ![]() Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or sheltered. Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not name-calling at all nosirree! ... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered. And the conservative college professors? Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to a college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have "real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible? DSK |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "DSK" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter? They got wiser, not smarter. Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience. Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered. It also explains the Kennedy types, and the hollywood crowd. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:29:54 -0400, DSK wrote:
NOYB wrote: Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will not change that. An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter? DSK They started listening to something besides CNN. -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |