Enough said.....

On 21 Jul 2004 12:32:08 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Enough said.....

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

:-(

You're so transparent, you'll be reincarnated as a window.

I'm sure those were your exact sentiments every time a handful of soldiers died
in isolated incidents during the previous presidency. Oh so sure.

On 22 Jul 2004 14:54:24 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

:-(

You're so transparent, you'll be reincarnated as a window.

I'm sure those were your exact sentiments every time a handful of soldiers died
in isolated incidents during the previous presidency. Oh so sure.


Yes, it was, so? If nothing else, I'm consistent. Playing the moral
equivalency fallacy doesn't change the here and now.

Dave

Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 21 Jul 2004 12:32:08 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Enough said.....

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

wow, what a narrow minded piece of crap.....
why do you insist, in almost all of your posts, to compare apples and
oranges? WWII wasn't a war just to appease oil hungry big business
maniacs.

On 22 Jul 2004 11:17:38 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 21 Jul 2004 12:32:08 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Enough said.....

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

wow, what a narrow minded piece of crap.....
why do you insist, in almost all of your posts, to compare apples and
oranges? WWII wasn't a war just to appease oil hungry big business
maniacs.

And neither was Iraq, your biased and myopic opinions notwithstanding.

Dave

Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 22 Jul 2004 11:17:38 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 21 Jul 2004 12:32:08 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Enough said.....

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

wow, what a narrow minded piece of crap.....
why do you insist, in almost all of your posts, to compare apples and
oranges? WWII wasn't a war just to appease oil hungry big business
maniacs.

And neither was Iraq, your biased and myopic opinions notwithstanding.

Dave

At least NOYB admits it was for the oil. What's your take? The WMD's?
The power that Rumsfield helped him achieve?

On 23 Jul 2004 11:04:29 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 22 Jul 2004 11:17:38 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Dave Hall wrote in message . ..
On 21 Jul 2004 12:32:08 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

Enough said.....

So what's you point? We've lost more men than that in a single battle
in WWII. War=Death. Deal with it.

Dave

wow, what a narrow minded piece of crap.....
why do you insist, in almost all of your posts, to compare apples and
oranges? WWII wasn't a war just to appease oil hungry big business
maniacs.

And neither was Iraq, your biased and myopic opinions notwithstanding.

Dave

At least NOYB admits it was for the oil. What's your take? The WMD's?
The power that Rumsfield helped him achieve?

It never was about stealing oil. It's about ridding the world of an
unstable and potentially threatening influence, and paving the way for
democratizing the region, and ultimately taking away the sentiment
that fuels terrorism.

Dave