NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:46:27 -0400, John Gaquin wrote:


It's clear he took a number of copies, plus the notes he had
contemporaneously generated, which were also supposed to be subject to
censorship. But I understood from reports that there are, in fact, a
small number of originals now unaccounted for.

On further reading, I believe you are right. I found this:

"The missing documents involve two or three draft versions of the report
as it was evolving and being refined by the Clinton administration,
officials and lawyers say. The Archives is believed to have copies of some
of the missing documents."

Still, as they are draft versions, it's criminal, but unlikely
revisionist.

http://news.lawinfo.com/story/3_ds_34549.cfm

Today, I went back and read the transcript of Berger's testimony before the
9/11 commission from March 24th, 2004. An interesting exchange took place
between Commission member Fielding and Mr. Berger, in which they were
discussing the "after-action" report from the time period between December
'98 and mid-'99. I believe this is the same after-action report


You believe?

Based on what?

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message news:gTWKc.5015


It seems that Mr. Wilson *lied* about who really sent him.

Virtually every aspect of Wilson's story has been
discredited.
About
the
only fact remaining is that he did, in fact, go to Africa.



Virtually every aspect of everything Bush has done since
presuming
office has been discredited.

It's not Bush people who under investigation by the Justice
Dept. for
stealing classified info from the 9/11 Commission reading room.
What
do
he
and the Clinton administration have to hide? We already know
that
their
leader-in-thief is a liar. Now we're learning that his closest
advisors
are
crooked too...which really is no surprise.



Amazing timing, eh? And three leaks to CNN from the Bush White
House.
Gosh...could it be political?


Cheney shoved the papers down Berger's pants, right?



Probably the notes from Cheney's secret energy policy meetings.

Cheney didn't hide them. He openly told the Dems to go ****
themselves.
They sued him in court...and lost.

Berger stole top secret info. Even if done "by accident", it's a
felony.

So....you've already convicted him, huh? Good Patriot Act thing, I'd
bet. No need for a trial, no need for evidence, no need for anything
but the Bush gestapo....


Sandy will do ok, but this January, as we give Bush his happy send-off
into retirement, let's not forget to tar and feather those chimp ears of
his.

Berger stole the alternate versions of an intelligence after-action report
from the archives, and then perjured himself before the 9/11 commission 5
months later. When specifically asked by the Commission on March 24th,
2004, he testified that he never saw the report. Yesterday, he claimed that
he inadvertently took the report from the archives.


FIELDING: But there was an after-action report.

BERGER: I'm sure there was.

FIELDING: Thank you.

BERGER: No, excuse me. Let me correct the record. I'm not sure there was. I
believe there was, Mr. Fielding. And I remember being told that and but
*I've never seen an after-action report*.



----------------------------------------------------------

This is just the tip of the iceberg. And Daschle is just fueling the fire
by filing a Freedom of Information Act claim demanding that all of the
correspondence between the White House and the Justice Department be made
public. He's playing right into Republican hands. Republicans *want* the
info in those alternate versions of the after-action report to be made
public...and Daschle is unwittingly getting that info unclassified. What a
doofus!






You haven't been correct on much of anything yet...and I am sure you
will be continuing your asinine track record.

--
A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush;
A vote for Bush is a vote for Apocalypse.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John Gaquin wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message news:gTWKc.5015


It seems that Mr. Wilson *lied* about who really sent
him.

Virtually every aspect of Wilson's story has been
discredited.
About
the
only fact remaining is that he did, in fact, go to Africa.



Virtually every aspect of everything Bush has done since
presuming
office has been discredited.

It's not Bush people who under investigation by the Justice
Dept. for
stealing classified info from the 9/11 Commission reading
room.
What
do
he
and the Clinton administration have to hide? We already know
that
their
leader-in-thief is a liar. Now we're learning that his
closest
advisors
are
crooked too...which really is no surprise.



Amazing timing, eh? And three leaks to CNN from the Bush White
House.
Gosh...could it be political?


Cheney shoved the papers down Berger's pants, right?



Probably the notes from Cheney's secret energy policy meetings.

Cheney didn't hide them. He openly told the Dems to go ****
themselves.
They sued him in court...and lost.

Berger stole top secret info. Even if done "by accident", it's a
felony.

So....you've already convicted him, huh? Good Patriot Act thing, I'd
bet. No need for a trial, no need for evidence, no need for anything
but the Bush gestapo....


Sandy will do ok, but this January, as we give Bush his happy send-off
into retirement, let's not forget to tar and feather those chimp ears
of
his.

Berger stole the alternate versions of an intelligence after-action
report
from the archives, and then perjured himself before the 9/11 commission
5
months later. When specifically asked by the Commission on March 24th,
2004, he testified that he never saw the report. Yesterday, he claimed
that
he inadvertently took the report from the archives.


FIELDING: But there was an after-action report.

BERGER: I'm sure there was.

FIELDING: Thank you.

BERGER: No, excuse me. Let me correct the record. I'm not sure there
was. I
believe there was, Mr. Fielding. And I remember being told that and but
*I've never seen an after-action report*.



----------------------------------------------------------

This is just the tip of the iceberg. And Daschle is just fueling the
fire
by filing a Freedom of Information Act claim demanding that all of the
correspondence between the White House and the Justice Department be
made
public. He's playing right into Republican hands. Republicans *want*
the
info in those alternate versions of the after-action report to be made
public...and Daschle is unwittingly getting that info unclassified.
What a
doofus!






You haven't been correct on much of anything yet...and I am sure you
will be continuing your asinine track record.


I've made a lot of predictions. Go ahead and show me one of 'em where I've
been wrong.

cause that is the only way they can
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

The Senate Intelligence Report recently stated: "The CIA
should have told
the Vice President and other senior policy members that it
had sent someone
to Niger to look into the alleged Iraq-Nigerian uranium
deal and should have
briefed the Vice President on the former ambassador's
findings".

But on July 6th, 2003, Joe Wilson told us "that the CIA
sent him to Niger
in February 2002 at the request of Vice President Dick
Cheney's office".

It seems that Mr. Wilson *lied* about who really sent him.
A recently
discovered memo in his *wife's* handwriting indicates that
*she* was the one
who suggested that her husband go to Niger.


Why do liberals always have to lie in order to win an
election?


Cheney's lying. Again.