"JAXAshby" wrote in message

so, guesses become precision by planning to make guesses?

I never said any such thing. Learn to read.

wanna explain to the aviation world, the world of physicists, or the
nautical
underwriters how *your* world is an improvement over reality just because
*you*
want it to be?

you guys who claim the laws of physics don't apply to boats

I never said that, either.

Funny you should mention aviation, though. What I *have* done is DR a 727
across the Atlantic, more than once, and have taught navigation courses for
the last six years.

shen, Denver to Mpls non-stop at night is not a daysail.

Subject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 07/20/2004 06:26 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Both dead reckoning and ded reckoning are considered acceptable in common
daily usage, jax.

lots of things are in common usage, but that make the usage correct in its
statement that "dead" reckoning is accurate. it is not. it IS "deduced"
reckoning, and with all that that implies.


One question. How many times have you been the person in charge of navigation
on anything but a day trip on LI Sound never out of sight of land?

Shen

so, guesses become precision by planning to make guesses?

I never said any such thing. Learn to read.

you most certainly did, when you said taht guesses become precision by making a
lot of guesses. johnny, you are not one of those stew ped USPS "instructors",
are you?

wanna explain to the aviation world, the world of physicists, or the
nautical
underwriters how *your* world is an improvement over reality just because
*you*
want it to be?

you guys who claim the laws of physics don't apply to boats

I never said that, either.

you most certainly did, when you said *you* can navigate using just a compass
and speed indicator.

Funny you should mention aviation, though. What I *have* done is DR a 727
across the Atlantic, more than once,

no, you have not. a 727 is NEVER flown DR. knock it off.

and have taught navigation courses for
the last six years.

how many people have you killed, so far.

ANYone who insists on teaching newbies that a compass and a speed indicator is
most certainly purposely trying to kill people. unless, of course, they are
too stew ped to pass high school geometry even after three tries.

dood, knock it off.

(JAXAshby)
Date: 07/21/2004 05:38 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

shen, Denver to Mpls non-stop at night is not a daysail.

Interesting. So, you've navigated a plane, once, as the person in charge of
navigation, over land.... not the most experienced at this, are you.
In truth, I wasn't interested in some aircraft navigation. Although the basics
are the same there are a number of differences in the details and dem details
can get you "dead".
Next question. How many known channels have you navigated in fog?

Shen

Jax,
If you use a basic program like Express to read and post to the
newsgroup you can have spell check verify all out going posts so you won't
make typo mistakes. It's a great thing.
Paul

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
so, guesses become precision by planning to make guesses?

I never said any such thing. Learn to read.

you most certainly did, when you said taht guesses become precision by
making a
lot of guesses. johnny, you are not one of those stew ped USPS
"instructors",
are you?

"JAXAshby" wrote in message

no, you have not. a 727 is NEVER flown DR. knock it off.

You would know.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message

you most certainly did, when you said taht guesses become precision by
making a
lot of guesses.

You really need to regularly attend your AA meetings.